From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Mani Tofigh" <mt4022@columbia.edu>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix directory link counts after fast commit replay
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 00:16:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-209891@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261111-ext4-fc-replay-mkdir-v1-3-4b20be29aed8@columbia.edu>
> From: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
>
> After a crash, the fast commit replay of a mkdir leaves the new
> directory with one link and its parent with one link too few. e2fsck
> then reports:
>
> Inode 2 ref count is 3, should be 4.
> Inode 14 ref count is 1, should be 2.
>
> Fast commits don't track directories, so the replay of a CREAT tag has
> to redo what ext4_mkdir() does. ext4_fc_replay_create() sets the
> link count of the new inode to 1 even for a directory, and nothing
> counts the new ".." in the parent. The replay of an rmdir has the
> opposite problem. __ext4_unlink() drops only one link of the directory
> and the parent keeps the link of the removed "..":
>
> Inode 2 ref count is 4, should be 3.
>
> Give a new directory 2 links and count it in its parent once its entry
> is added. When an UNLINK tag removes a directory, drop all its links
> and one link of the parent like ext4_rmdir() does. Both halves have to
> go together since today a mkdir and an rmdir replayed in sequence
> cancel out.
>
> With the fix, e2fsck doesn't find wrong link counts after the replay
> anymore.
>
> Fixes: 8016e29f4362 ("ext4: fast commit recovery path")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mani Tofigh <mt4022@columbia.edu>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261111-ext4-fc-replay-mkdir-v1-0-4b20be29aed8@columbia.edu?part=3
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-11 23:02 [PATCH 0/3] ext4: fix counts left by fast commit replay of a mkdir Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fix directory count after fast commit replay Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 0:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] ext4: fix directory i_blocks " Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 0:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-11 23:02 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: fix directory link counts " Mani Tofigh via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 0:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-209891@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mt4022@columbia.edu \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox