[PATCH] staging: fbtft: name the no-op endian modifier in define_fbtft_write_reg()

[PATCH] staging: fbtft: name the no-op endian modifier in define_fbtft_write_reg()

[anshika]

Two of the three define_fbtft_write_reg() instantiations pass an empty
modifier argument, which checkpatch flags as a fragile empty macro
argument. Give the no-op case an explicit name instead of leaving it
blank.

No functional change.

Link: https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2602.0/01917.html

Signed-off-by: anshika <anshikajain196872@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
index 30e436ff1..e03aa251c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
  *   void (*write_reg)(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...);
  *
  *****************************************************************************/
+#define cpu_to_cpu_endian(x) (x)
 
 #define define_fbtft_write_reg(func, buffer_type, data_type, modifier)        \
 void func(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)                                \
@@ -62,9 +63,9 @@ out:									      \
 }                                                                             \
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(func);
 
-define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8, )
+define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8, cpu_to_cpu_endian)
 define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus8, __be16, u16, cpu_to_be16)
-define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16, )
+define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16, cpu_to_cpu_endian)
 
 void fbtft_write_reg8_bus9(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
 {
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: name the no-op endian modifier in define_fbtft_write_reg()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Sun, Aug 30, 2026 at 09:45:29PM +0530, anshika wrote:
> Two of the three define_fbtft_write_reg() instantiations pass an empty
> modifier argument, which checkpatch flags as a fragile empty macro
> argument. Give the no-op case an explicit name instead of leaving it
> blank.

Checkpatch is wrong.

> No functional change.
> 
> Link: https://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/2602.0/01917.html
> 
> Signed-off-by: anshika <anshikajain196872@gmail.com>

We would need a full name anyway.

Just leave this as-is please, it's fine.

thanks,

greg k-h