Linux Framebuffer Layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] staging: fbtft: replace empty modifier argument with no-op macro
@ 2026-06-25  9:27 suryasaimadhu
  2026-06-25 10:28 ` Dan Carpenter
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: suryasaimadhu @ 2026-06-25  9:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: andy
  Cc: gregkh, dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-staging, linux-kernel,
	suryasaimadhu

Define fbtft_write_reg_no_modifier() as an identity function and
use it in place of empty modifier arguments in define_fbtft_write_reg()
calls to fix checkpatch errors.

Signed-off-by: suryasaimadhu <suryasaimadhu369@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
index 30e436ff1..2169f8d1d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/fbtft/fbtft-bus.c
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
  *
  *****************************************************************************/
 
+#define fbtft_write_reg_no_modifier(x) (x)
 #define define_fbtft_write_reg(func, buffer_type, data_type, modifier)        \
 void func(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)                                \
 {                                                                             \
@@ -62,9 +63,9 @@ out:									      \
 }                                                                             \
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(func);
 
-define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8, )
+define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg8_bus8, u8, u8, fbtft_write_reg_no_modifier)
 define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus8, __be16, u16, cpu_to_be16)
-define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16, )
+define_fbtft_write_reg(fbtft_write_reg16_bus16, u16, u16, fbtft_write_reg_no_modifier)
 
 void fbtft_write_reg8_bus9(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, ...)
 {
-- 
2.47.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: replace empty modifier argument with no-op macro
  2026-06-25  9:27 [PATCH] staging: fbtft: replace empty modifier argument with no-op macro suryasaimadhu
@ 2026-06-25 10:28 ` Dan Carpenter
  2026-06-25 10:30   ` Sai Madhu
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2026-06-25 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: suryasaimadhu
  Cc: andy, gregkh, dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-staging, linux-kernel

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 05:27:21PM +0800, suryasaimadhu wrote:
> Define fbtft_write_reg_no_modifier() as an identity function and
> use it in place of empty modifier arguments in define_fbtft_write_reg()
> calls to fix checkpatch errors.
> 
> Signed-off-by: suryasaimadhu <suryasaimadhu369@gmail.com>
> ---

I don't hate this patch, but I think we've decided to leave this
as-is.

regards,
dan carpenter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: replace empty modifier argument with no-op macro
  2026-06-25 10:28 ` Dan Carpenter
@ 2026-06-25 10:30   ` Sai Madhu
  2026-06-25 14:09     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sai Madhu @ 2026-06-25 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Carpenter
  Cc: andy, gregkh, dri-devel, linux-fbdev, linux-staging, linux-kernel

Hi Dan,

Thank you for the feedback. I understand and will drop this patch.

I have also noticed two pre-existing bugs in the same file
(unaligned access and buffer size calculation when startbyte is used)
and have sent a separate patch to fix those.

Regards,
suryasaimadhu

On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 at 15:58, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 05:27:21PM +0800, suryasaimadhu wrote:
> > Define fbtft_write_reg_no_modifier() as an identity function and
> > use it in place of empty modifier arguments in define_fbtft_write_reg()
> > calls to fix checkpatch errors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: suryasaimadhu <suryasaimadhu369@gmail.com>
> > ---
>
> I don't hate this patch, but I think we've decided to leave this
> as-is.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] staging: fbtft: replace empty modifier argument with no-op macro
  2026-06-25 10:30   ` Sai Madhu
@ 2026-06-25 14:09     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2026-06-25 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sai Madhu
  Cc: Dan Carpenter, andy, gregkh, dri-devel, linux-fbdev,
	linux-staging, linux-kernel

On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 04:00:24PM +0530, Sai Madhu wrote:

First of all, do not top-post!

> Thank you for the feedback. I understand and will drop this patch.
> 
> I have also noticed two pre-existing bugs in the same file
> (unaligned access and buffer size calculation when startbyte is used)
> and have sent a separate patch to fix those.

> On Thu, 25 Jun 2026 at 15:58, Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 05:27:21PM +0800, suryasaimadhu wrote:

> > I don't hate this patch, but I think we've decided to leave this
> > as-is.

Yep. as Dan said,

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-25 14:09 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-25  9:27 [PATCH] staging: fbtft: replace empty modifier argument with no-op macro suryasaimadhu
2026-06-25 10:28 ` Dan Carpenter
2026-06-25 10:30   ` Sai Madhu
2026-06-25 14:09     ` Andy Shevchenko

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox