Linux Framebuffer Layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>,
	"Helge Deller" <deller@gmx.de>,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	"Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: fbdev: arkfb: Move a variable assignment behind a condition check in ics5342_init()
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 09:24:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b04526a3-41b4-4eb6-9f1c-3b0858ae3257@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alvzxjwBr1gxu3Eb@monoceros>

>> Does your understanding of programming language details differ from the view of
>> SEI CERT C Coding Standard (from the Carnegie Mellon University)?
>> https://cmu-sei.github.io/secure-coding-standards/sei-cert-c-coding-standard/rules/expressions-exp/exp34-c/
> 
> We recently discussed a similar case where several people told you that
> the "problem" you fixed wasn't actually a problem.

We came along possible adjustments according to an application of another
questionable sanity check.


>                                                    This patch is in the
> same category and your reference doesn't match the code touched here.

Will development interests grow if bug reports will follow by further known
source code analysis tools?
https://cmu-sei.github.io/secure-coding-standards/sei-cert-c-coding-standard/rules/expressions-exp/exp34-c/#automated-detection


> Please stop to absorb maintainer attention with useless stuff.
Do we need to start negotiations for allocation of a corresponding CVE ID
(as something happened for similar control flows before)?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/cve.rst?h=v7.2-rc3#n16

Regards,
Markus

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-19  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-13 10:18 [PATCH] fbdev: arkfb: Move a variable assignment behind a condition check in ics5342_init() Markus Elfring
2026-07-18 18:17 ` Helge Deller
2026-07-18 20:34   ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-18 20:59     ` Helge Deller
2026-07-19  6:50       ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-20  9:52       ` Markus Elfring
2026-07-18 21:47     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-07-19  7:24       ` Markus Elfring [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b04526a3-41b4-4eb6-9f1c-3b0858ae3257@web.de \
    --to=markus.elfring@web.de \
    --cc=deller@gmx.de \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox