Linux-Firmware Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* License and copyright on 'native' files?
@ 2024-02-07 14:48 Diederik de Haas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Diederik de Haas @ 2024-02-07 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-firmware

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 711 bytes --]

Hi,

Lintian reported several file-without-copyright-information wrt the repo's 
'native' files, like Makefile, README, WHENCE and that'll likely also apply to 
Dockerfile and the various dotfiles.

The Gitlab repo indicates it's Apache 2.0, but I'm not sure whether that is 
correct or that gitlab assumed it was due to some heuristics.
The README.md does mention "in a GPL'd work", but I'm guessing that refers to 
the GPL-2.0 of the kernel itself.

I saw that 'copy-firmware.sh' is licensed under GPL-2.0, but the other files I 
checked didn't indicate the license of those files. And none (?) seem to have a 
copyright statement.

Can the license and copyright (situation) be clarified?

Regards,
  Diederik

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2024-02-07 14:48 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-07 14:48 License and copyright on 'native' files? Diederik de Haas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox