Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: send: add support for fs-verity

[David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>]

On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 06:35:07PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Boris,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test WARNING on kdave/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on next-20220728]
> [cannot apply to fscrypt/fsverity linus/master v5.19-rc8]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Boris-Burkov/btrfs-send-add-support-for-fs-verity/20220729-021228
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux.git for-next
> config: i386-randconfig-s002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220731/202207311836.xrPNTFhA-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-3) 11.3.0
> reproduce:
>         # apt-get install sparse
>         # sparse version: v0.6.4-39-gce1a6720-dirty
>         # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/cd0224725d17f6e9ebabdddeea5bc5743a9250ae
>         git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
>         git fetch --no-tags linux-review Boris-Burkov/btrfs-send-add-support-for-fs-verity/20220729-021228
>         git checkout cd0224725d17f6e9ebabdddeea5bc5743a9250ae
>         # save the config file
>         mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
>         make W=1 C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash fs/btrfs/
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> 
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> fs/btrfs/send.c:4906:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 4 (different base types) @@     expected int len @@     got restricted __le32 [usertype] sig_size @@
>    fs/btrfs/send.c:4906:9: sparse:     expected int len
>    fs/btrfs/send.c:4906:9: sparse:     got restricted __le32 [usertype] sig_size

The types are compatible, should this use the get_unaligned_le32 or
what's the supposed fix?