From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] fscrypt: move all the shared mode key setup deeper
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:56:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230411035604.GG47625@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <07509950e40e37344aac535a07d8176f680a7e18.1681155143.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 03:40:00PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> +static const u8 FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_KEY_MASK =
> + (FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY
> + | FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64
> + | FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32);
A comment describing the meaning of the above constant would be helpful.
> +static size_t fill_hkdf_info(const struct fscrypt_info *ci, u8 *hkdf_info)
Maybe call this fill_hkdf_info_for_mode_key() to avoid ambiguity with other uses
of HKDF? Also, maybe add an explicit array size to hkdf_info? E.g.
hkdf_info[MAX_MODE_KEY_HKDF_INFO_SIZE]
> +static u8 hkdf_context_for_policy(const union fscrypt_policy *policy)
> +{
> + switch (fscrypt_policy_flags(policy) & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_KEY_MASK) {
> + case FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY:
> + return HKDF_CONTEXT_DIRECT_KEY;
> + case FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_64:
> + return HKDF_CONTEXT_IV_INO_LBLK_64_KEY;
> + case FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32:
> + return HKDF_CONTEXT_IV_INO_LBLK_32_KEY;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
There's an extra level of indentation above.
Also, more importantly, since fill_hkdf_info() checks the policy flags anyway,
maybe just handle the HKDF context bytes directly in there? E.g.:
if (ci->ci_policy.v2.flags & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_DIRECT_KEY) {
hkdf_info[0] = HKDF_CONTEXT_DIRECT_KEY;
return 1;
}
if (ci->ci_policy.v2.flags & FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAG_IV_INO_LBLK_32)
hkdf_info[0] = HKDF_CONTEXT_IV_INO_LBLK_32_KEY;
else
hkdf_info[0] = HKDF_CONTEXT_IV_INO_LBLK_64_KEY;
memcpy(&hkdf_info[1], &sb->s_uuid, sizeof(sb->s_uuid));
return 1 + sizeof(sb->s_uuid);
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-11 3:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 19:39 [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] fscrypt: move inline crypt decision to info setup Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] fscrypt: split and rename setup_file_encryption_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:24 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] fscrypt: split and rename setup_per_mode_enc_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:29 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] fscrypt: move dirhash key setup away from IO key setup Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:35 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] fscrypt: reduce special-casing of IV_INO_LBLK_32 Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:38 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] fscrypt: make infos have a pointer to prepared keys Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:44 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-11 16:26 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] fscrypt: move all the shared mode key setup deeper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:56 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] fscrypt: make ci->ci_direct_key a bool not a pointer Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:57 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] fscrypt: make prepared keys record their type Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] fscrypt: explicitly track prepared parts of key Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 4:05 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-11 16:45 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 21:21 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] fscrypt: split key alloc and preparation Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230411035604.GG47625@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox