From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] fscrypt: make ci->ci_direct_key a bool not a pointer
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:57:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230411035710.GH47625@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae5cc986b52b950ee81d613093310a52be3972d9.1681155143.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 03:40:01PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> The ci_direct_key field is only used for v1 direct key policies,
> recording the direct key that needs to have its refcount reduced when
> the crypt_info is freed. However, now that crypt_info->ci_enc_key is a
> pointer to the authoritative prepared key -- embedded in the direct key,
> in this case, we no longer need to keep a full pointer to the direct key
> -- we can use container_of() to go from the prepared key to its
> surrounding direct key. Thus we can make ci_direct_key a bool instead of
> a pointer, saving a few bytes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
> ---
> fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 7 +++----
> fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 2 +-
> fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c | 7 +++++--
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> index 5011737b60b3..b575fb58a506 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> +++ b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> @@ -234,10 +234,9 @@ struct fscrypt_info {
> struct list_head ci_master_key_link;
>
> /*
> - * If non-NULL, then encryption is done using the master key directly
> - * and ci_enc_key will equal ci_direct_key->dk_key.
> + * If true, then encryption is done using the master key directly.
> */
> - struct fscrypt_direct_key *ci_direct_key;
> + bool ci_direct_key;
This just gets deleted by the next patch. Should they be folded together?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-11 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 19:39 [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] fscrypt: move inline crypt decision to info setup Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] fscrypt: split and rename setup_file_encryption_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:24 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] fscrypt: split and rename setup_per_mode_enc_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:29 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] fscrypt: move dirhash key setup away from IO key setup Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:35 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] fscrypt: reduce special-casing of IV_INO_LBLK_32 Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:38 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] fscrypt: make infos have a pointer to prepared keys Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:44 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-11 16:26 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] fscrypt: move all the shared mode key setup deeper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:56 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] fscrypt: make ci->ci_direct_key a bool not a pointer Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:57 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] fscrypt: make prepared keys record their type Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] fscrypt: explicitly track prepared parts of key Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 4:05 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-11 16:45 ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 21:21 ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] fscrypt: split key alloc and preparation Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230411035710.GH47625@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox