Linux FSCRYPT development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/11] fscrypt: make ci->ci_direct_key a bool not a pointer
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2023 20:57:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230411035710.GH47625@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae5cc986b52b950ee81d613093310a52be3972d9.1681155143.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 03:40:01PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> The ci_direct_key field is only used for v1 direct key policies,
> recording the direct key that needs to have its refcount reduced when
> the crypt_info is freed. However, now that crypt_info->ci_enc_key is a
> pointer to the authoritative prepared key -- embedded in the direct key,
> in this case, we no longer need to keep a full pointer to the direct key
> -- we can use container_of() to go from the prepared key to its
> surrounding direct key. Thus we can make ci_direct_key a bool instead of
> a pointer, saving a few bytes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
> ---
>  fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 7 +++----
>  fs/crypto/keysetup.c        | 2 +-
>  fs/crypto/keysetup_v1.c     | 7 +++++--
>  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> index 5011737b60b3..b575fb58a506 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> +++ b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> @@ -234,10 +234,9 @@ struct fscrypt_info {
>  	struct list_head ci_master_key_link;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * If non-NULL, then encryption is done using the master key directly
> -	 * and ci_enc_key will equal ci_direct_key->dk_key.
> +	 * If true, then encryption is done using the master key directly.
>  	 */
> -	struct fscrypt_direct_key *ci_direct_key;
> +	bool ci_direct_key;

This just gets deleted by the next patch.  Should they be folded together?

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-11  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-10 19:39 [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] fscrypt: move inline crypt decision to info setup Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] fscrypt: split and rename setup_file_encryption_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:24   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] fscrypt: split and rename setup_per_mode_enc_key() Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:29   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] fscrypt: move dirhash key setup away from IO key setup Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:35   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] fscrypt: reduce special-casing of IV_INO_LBLK_32 Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:38   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:39 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] fscrypt: make infos have a pointer to prepared keys Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:44   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-11 16:26     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] fscrypt: move all the shared mode key setup deeper Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:56   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] fscrypt: make ci->ci_direct_key a bool not a pointer Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:57   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] fscrypt: make prepared keys record their type Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] fscrypt: explicitly track prepared parts of key Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  4:05   ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-11 16:45     ` Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11 21:21       ` Eric Biggers
2023-04-10 19:40 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] fscrypt: split key alloc and preparation Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-04-11  3:18 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] fscrypt: rearrangements preliminary to extent encryption Eric Biggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230411035710.GH47625@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox