From: Tao Cui <cui.tao@linux.dev>
To: Seth Forshee <sforshee@kernel.org>, Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: cui.tao@linux.dev, clm@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com,
josef@toxicpanda.com, brauner@kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: use mount idmap for defrag permission check
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:15:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1168774a-74d3-4e77-98e3-cd688a2d7e0f@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <an36yH30W965eqZk@ubuntu-x1>
在 2026/8/14 01:11, Seth Forshee 写道:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 04:04:05PM +0930, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> 在 2026/8/13 13:11, Tao Cui 写道:
>>> From: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>>>
>>> btrfs_ioctl_defrag() checks MAY_WRITE with nop_mnt_idmap, which skips
>>> the mount idmap. On an idmapped mount the owner comparison then uses
>>> the caller's fsuid against the raw on-disk uid, dropping the mapping.
>>> Every other permission/owner check in btrfs ioctl uses
>>> file_mnt_idmap(file) (e.g. :1152, :1310, :1946); this one missed it.
>>>
>>> Switch to file_mnt_idmap(file). It equals nop_mnt_idmap on a normal
>>> mount, and the check stays behind !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), so only
>>> unprivileged callers on idmapped btrfs change. The RO-fd note in the
>>> comment above is about the file descriptor, not this inode check, and
>>> is unaffected.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Cui <cuitao@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> Fixes: 4609e1f18e19 ("fs: port ->permission() to pass mnt_idmap")
>
> This is a misattribution. Using nop_mnt_idmap there keeps the behavior
> the same as it was before the commit. Switching to the mount idmap opens
> up BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG* to idmapped users when they weren't before, which
> is a separate policy decision that didn't belong in that change.
>
Agreed, I'll resend it as a behavior change with no Fixes tag.
> Saying that these ioctls should be allowed for idmapped users just
> because others are isn't a good justification. Why are these ioctls safe
> for idmapped users? Do they actually require this capability?
>
The check isn't a privilege gate. 616d374efa23 added it to test "whether
the file could have been opened rw", and the caller can already do that
on the idmapped mount -- open O_RDWR, write(), fallocate(). Only the
regular-file branch changes, and defrag only reorganizes the caller's
own extents; the S_IFDIR branch (whole-subvolume defrag) keeps its
capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN).
Nothing is weakened: !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN) stays exactly as is.
may_dedupe_file() in fs/remap_range.c already gates FIDEDUPERANGE the
same way -- capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN), then i_uid_into_vfsuid(
file_mnt_idmap(file)) / inode_permission(idmap, MAY_WRITE) -- and dedupe
is stronger, since it can rewrite one file's extents from another file's
contents. Idmapped users can already dedupe on btrfs.
Thanks,
Tao
> Thanks,
> Seth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 3:41 [PATCH] btrfs: use mount idmap for defrag permission check Tao Cui
2026-08-13 6:34 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-13 17:11 ` Seth Forshee
2026-08-14 3:29 ` Qu Wenruo
2026-08-14 5:15 ` Tao Cui [this message]
2026-08-14 15:25 ` Seth Forshee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1168774a-74d3-4e77-98e3-cd688a2d7e0f@linux.dev \
--to=cui.tao@linux.dev \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=cuitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox