From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Alex Markuze <amarkuze@redhat.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>, Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfs@lists.linux.dev,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@redhat.com>,
Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>,
Patrick Donnelly <pdonnell@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Ceph and Netfslib
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 15:55:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <132458.1741276536@warthog.procyon.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAO8a2Sg2b2nW6S3ctS+H0F1Owt=rAkKCyjnFW3WoRSKYD-sSDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Does ceph_write_iter() actually need to drop the inode I/O lock in order to
handle EOLDSNAPC? I'm wondering if I can deal with it in the netfs request
retry code - but that means dealing with it whilst the I/O lock is held.
David
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-18 18:33 Ceph and Netfslib David Howells
2024-12-18 18:47 ` Patrick Donnelly
2024-12-18 19:36 ` David Howells
2024-12-18 19:06 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2024-12-18 19:48 ` David Howells
2024-12-23 23:13 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2024-12-24 12:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2024-12-24 21:52 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2025-01-09 0:53 ` Viacheslav Dubeyko
2024-12-18 19:43 ` David Howells
2025-03-05 16:34 ` Is EOLDSNAPC actually generated? -- " David Howells
2025-03-05 19:23 ` Alex Markuze
2025-03-05 20:22 ` David Howells
2025-03-06 13:19 ` Alex Markuze
2025-03-06 13:48 ` David Howells
2025-03-06 13:55 ` Alex Markuze
2025-03-06 13:58 ` Venky Shankar
2025-03-06 14:13 ` David Howells
2025-03-06 14:23 ` Alex Markuze
2025-03-06 16:21 ` Gregory Farnum
2025-03-06 17:18 ` Alex Markuze
2025-03-06 15:55 ` David Howells [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=132458.1741276536@warthog.procyon.org.uk \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=Slava.Dubeyko@ibm.com \
--cc=amarkuze@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gfarnum@redhat.com \
--cc=idryomov@gmail.com \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfs@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pdonnell@redhat.com \
--cc=vshankar@redhat.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox