Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
	feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [linux-next:master] [fs]  d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 19:25:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241016022532.GC1138@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202410151611.f4cd71f2-oliver.sang@intel.com>

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:19:25AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed a -5.1% regression of stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec

These emails that talk about negative regressions keep confusing me.  A negative
regression would be an improvement.  But that is not actually what is meant.

Wondering if the wording can be fixed to remove the minus sign.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-16  2:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-16  2:19 [linux-next:master] [fs] d91ea8195e: stress-ng.ring-pipe.ops_per_sec -5.1% regression (stress-ng.ring-pipe.pipe_read+write_calls_per_sec 7.3% improvement) kernel test robot
2024-10-16  2:25 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2024-10-16  5:50   ` Oliver Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241016022532.GC1138@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox