Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, cem@kernel.org,
	dchinner@redhat.com, hch@lst.de
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ojaswin@linux.ibm.com,
	ritesh.list@gmail.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/11] xfs: iomap CoW-based atomic write support
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 13:56:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250213135619.1148432-8-john.g.garry@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213135619.1148432-1-john.g.garry@oracle.com>

In cases of an atomic write occurs for misaligned or discontiguous disk
blocks, we will use a CoW-based method to issue the atomic write.

So, for that case, return -EAGAIN to request that the write be issued in
CoW atomic write mode. The dio write path should detect this, similar to
how misaligned regalar DIO writes are handled.

For normal HW-based mode, when the range which we are atomic writing to
covers a shared data extent, try to allocate a new CoW fork. However, if
we find that what we allocated does not meet atomic write requirements
in terms of length and alignment, then fallback on the CoW-based mode
for the atomic write.

Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
index ab79f0080288..c5ecfafbba60 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_iomap.c
@@ -795,6 +795,23 @@ imap_spans_range(
 	return true;
 }
 
+static bool
+imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(
+	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	*imap,
+	xfs_fileoff_t		offset_fsb,
+	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb)
+{
+	/* Misaligned start block wrt size */
+	if (!IS_ALIGNED(imap->br_startblock, imap->br_blockcount))
+		return false;
+
+	/* Discontiguous or mixed extents */
+	if (!imap_spans_range(imap, offset_fsb, end_fsb))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int
 xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
 	struct inode		*inode,
@@ -809,12 +826,20 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
 	struct xfs_bmbt_irec	imap, cmap;
 	xfs_fileoff_t		offset_fsb = XFS_B_TO_FSBT(mp, offset);
 	xfs_fileoff_t		end_fsb = xfs_iomap_end_fsb(mp, offset, length);
+	bool			atomic_cow = flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW;
+	bool			atomic_hw = flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW;
 	int			nimaps = 1, error = 0;
 	bool			shared = false;
 	u16			iomap_flags = 0;
+	xfs_fileoff_t		orig_offset_fsb;
+	xfs_fileoff_t		orig_end_fsb;
+	bool			needs_alloc;
 	unsigned int		lockmode;
 	u64			seq;
 
+	orig_offset_fsb = offset_fsb;
+	orig_end_fsb = end_fsb;
+
 	ASSERT(flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO));
 
 	if (xfs_is_shutdown(mp))
@@ -832,7 +857,7 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
 	 * COW writes may allocate delalloc space or convert unwritten COW
 	 * extents, so we need to make sure to take the lock exclusively here.
 	 */
-	if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip))
+	if (xfs_is_cow_inode(ip) || atomic_cow)
 		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_EXCL;
 	else
 		lockmode = XFS_ILOCK_SHARED;
@@ -857,6 +882,22 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
 	if (error)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
+	if (flags & IOMAP_ATOMIC_COW) {
+		error = xfs_reflink_allocate_cow(ip, &imap, &cmap, &shared,
+				&lockmode,
+				(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) || IS_DAX(inode), true);
+		/*
+		 * Don't check @shared. For atomic writes, we should error when
+		 * we don't get a CoW fork.
+		 */
+		if (error)
+			goto out_unlock;
+
+		end_fsb = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount;
+		length = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb) - offset;
+		goto out_found_cow;
+	}
+
 	if (imap_needs_cow(ip, flags, &imap, nimaps)) {
 		error = -EAGAIN;
 		if (flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
@@ -868,13 +909,38 @@ xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(
 				(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) || IS_DAX(inode), false);
 		if (error)
 			goto out_unlock;
-		if (shared)
+		if (shared) {
+			if (atomic_hw &&
+			    !imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(&cmap,
+					orig_offset_fsb, orig_end_fsb)) {
+				error = -EAGAIN;
+				goto out_unlock;
+			}
 			goto out_found_cow;
+		}
 		end_fsb = imap.br_startoff + imap.br_blockcount;
 		length = XFS_FSB_TO_B(mp, end_fsb) - offset;
 	}
 
-	if (imap_needs_alloc(inode, flags, &imap, nimaps))
+	needs_alloc = imap_needs_alloc(inode, flags, &imap, nimaps);
+
+	if (atomic_hw) {
+		error = -EAGAIN;
+		/*
+		 * Use CoW method for when we need to alloc > 1 block,
+		 * otherwise we might allocate less than what we need here and
+		 * have multiple mappings.
+		*/
+		if (needs_alloc && orig_end_fsb - orig_offset_fsb > 1)
+			goto out_unlock;
+
+		if (!imap_range_valid_for_atomic_write(&imap, orig_offset_fsb,
+						orig_end_fsb)) {
+			goto out_unlock;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (needs_alloc)
 		goto allocate_blocks;
 
 	/*
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-13 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-13 13:56 [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] iomap: Rename IOMAP_ATOMIC -> IOMAP_ATOMIC_HW John Garry
2025-02-24 20:23   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] xfs: Switch atomic write size check in xfs_file_write_iter() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:24   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] xfs: Refactor xfs_reflink_end_cow_extent() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:26   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:01     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:29       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] iomap: Support CoW-based atomic writes John Garry
2025-02-24 19:59   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:19     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:33       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] iomap: Lift blocksize restriction on " John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] xfs: Reflink CoW-based atomic write support John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 10:58     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:37       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:02         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` John Garry [this message]
2025-02-24 20:13   ` [PATCH v2 07/11] xfs: iomap " Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:06     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:47       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] xfs: Add xfs_file_dio_write_atomic() John Garry
2025-02-24 20:32   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] xfs: Commit CoW-based atomic writes atomically John Garry
2025-02-24 20:20   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:11     ` John Garry
2025-02-25 17:50       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 18:07         ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] xfs: Update atomic write max size John Garry
2025-02-24 20:34   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:13     ` John Garry
2025-02-13 13:56 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] xfs: Allow block allocator to take an alignment hint John Garry
2025-02-24 20:37   ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-02-25 11:17     ` John Garry
2025-02-20  7:48 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] large atomic writes for xfs with CoW John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250213135619.1148432-8-john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cem@kernel.org \
    --cc=dchinner@redhat.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ojaswin@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox