Re: [PATCH] iomap: use largest_zero_folio() in iomap_dio_zero()

[Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>]

On Mon, Aug 18, 2025 at 08:14:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 16:35:04 +0200 Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@samsung.com> wrote:
> 
> > >>> Applied to the vfs-6.18.iomap branch of the vfs/vfs.git tree.
> > >>> Patches in the vfs-6.18.iomap branch should appear in linux-next soon.
> > >>
> > >> Hmm, AFAIK largest_zero_folio just showed up in mm.git a few days ago.
> > >> Wouldn't it be better to queue up this change there?
> > >>
> > >>
> > > 
> > > Indeed, compiling vfs/vfs.all as of today fails with:
> > > 
> > > fs/iomap/direct-io.c:281:36: error: implicit declaration of function 
> > > ‘largest_zero_folio’; did you mean ‘is_zero_folio’? [-Wimplicit- 
> > > function-declaration]
> > > 
> > > Reverting "iomap: use largest_zero_folio() in iomap_dio_zero()" fixes 
> > > the compilation.
> > > 
> > 
> > I also got some reports from Stephen in linux-next. As Christoph 
> > suggested, maybe we drop the patches from Christian's tree and queue it 
> > up via Andrew's tree
> 
> Thanks, I added it to mm.git.

Please ask before you move stuff around between trees. You've complained
to me before about this before too. I haven't agreed to that at all.

There's a bunch more iomap work coming and this will most certainly not
start going through mm trees. So if there's merge conflicts where we
rely on a helper that's in mm-next the good thing would simply to
provide a branch for us with that helper that we can base this off of.