[PATCH 1/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race

[PATCH 1/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race

[Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)]

make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() arms the UFFD_WP bit on a present HugeTLB PTE by
calling huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() with a ptent snapshot that was
fetched without the corresponding huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(). The
start helper is what atomically clears the entry so the kernel-owned
snapshot stays consistent until the commit; without it, the hardware
may set Dirty or Accessed in the live PTE between the original read
and the commit, and huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() (whose generic
implementation just calls set_huge_pte_at()) then writes the stale
snapshot back over the live hardware bits, losing the update.

The non-hugetlb sibling make_uffd_wp_pte() does this correctly via
ptep_modify_prot_start() / ptep_modify_prot_commit(). Mirror that
pattern for the present-PTE branch. The migration case stays as-is --
migration entries are non-present, so there's no hardware update to
race against.

Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 1e3a15bf46f4..e21a38ac745b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -2610,12 +2610,16 @@ static void make_uffd_wp_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 	if (softleaf_is_hwpoison(entry) || softleaf_is_marker(entry))
 		return;
 
-	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry))
+	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
 		set_huge_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep,
 				pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(ptent), psize);
-	else
-		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, ptent,
-					     huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(ptent));
+	} else {
+		pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
+
+		old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
+		new_pte = huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(old_pte);
+		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, old_pte, new_pte);
+	}
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
 
-- 
2.54.0

[PATCH 2/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: use huge_page_size() in pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry()

[Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)]

The partial-page check compares against HPAGE_SIZE (PMD_SIZE), which
is wrong for gigantic hugetlb hstates (e.g. 1G). The walker hands the
callback a huge_page_size()-sized range, never start + HPAGE_SIZE, so
the comparison always declares it partial and aborts the WP. Compare
against the actual hstate's page size.

Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index e21a38ac745b..1489c67e88f7 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -2960,7 +2960,7 @@ static int pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask,
 	if (~categories & PAGE_IS_WRITTEN)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	if (end != start + HPAGE_SIZE) {
+	if (end != start + huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma))) {
 		/* Partial HugeTLB page WP isn't possible. */
 		pagemap_scan_backout_range(p, start, end);
 		p->arg.walk_end = start;
-- 
2.54.0

[PATCH 3/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix hugetlb self-deadlock in pagemap_scan_pte_hole()

[Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta)]

A PAGEMAP_SCAN ioctl requesting PM_SCAN_WP_MATCHING on a hugetlb VMA hangs
the calling thread, unkillably, as soon as the scan reaches an unpopulated
part of the range:

  do_pagemap_scan()
    walk_page_range()
      walk_hugetlb_range()
        hugetlb_vma_lock_read()           # take the vma lock for read ...
        pagemap_scan_pte_hole()           # ... ->pte_hole() for a hole
          uffd_wp_range()
            change_protection()
              hugetlb_change_protection()
                hugetlb_vma_lock_write()  # ... and block taking it for write

walk_hugetlb_range() holds the hugetlb vma lock for read across the whole
walk.  A present entry goes to ->hugetlb_entry(); an unpopulated one goes
to ->pte_hole(), i.e. pagemap_scan_pte_hole().  To write-protect the hole
that handler calls uffd_wp_range(), which on a hugetlb VMA reaches
hugetlb_change_protection() and takes the same vma lock for write.  The
thread then blocks in down_write() waiting for the read lock it is itself
holding.

The populated path avoids this: pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry() write-protects
the entry inline under the page-table lock and never enters
hugetlb_change_protection().

Do the same for holes.  Fault in the page table and install the uffd-wp
marker directly with make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() under the page-table lock,
rather than routing through uffd_wp_range().  That is the same sequence
hugetlb_change_protection() runs for an unpopulated entry, minus the vma
write lock -- which is safe to skip because PMD sharing is disabled on
uffd-wp VMAs (hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds() runs at registration), leaving
nothing for that lock to serialise against.

Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: Claude:claude-opus-4-8
---
 fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
index 1489c67e88f7..06fb94a965ff 100644
--- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
+++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
@@ -2977,8 +2977,62 @@ static int pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask,
 
 	return ret;
 }
+
+/*
+ * Write-protect the unpopulated hugetlb entries covering [addr, end) by
+ * installing uffd-wp markers inline, exactly as pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry()
+ * does for populated entries.
+ *
+ * walk_hugetlb_range() currently calls ->pte_hole() once per huge page, so the
+ * loop normally runs a single iteration; it is written to cover the full range
+ * in case the walker ever coalesces adjacent holes.
+ *
+ * The obvious route -- uffd_wp_range() -> hugetlb_change_protection() --
+ * cannot be used here: it takes hugetlb_vma_lock_write(), but the page-table
+ * walker (walk_hugetlb_range()) already holds hugetlb_vma_lock_read() on the
+ * same VMA, so the scanning thread would deadlock against itself. PMD sharing
+ * is disabled on uffd-wp VMAs (hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds() at registration), so
+ * the vma lock guards nothing that matters for these entries anyway.
+ */
+static int pagemap_scan_hugetlb_hole_wp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{
+	struct hstate *h = hstate_vma(vma);
+	unsigned long psize = huge_page_size(h);
+	struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
+	spinlock_t *ptl;
+	pte_t *ptep;
+	pte_t pte;
+
+	for (addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, psize); addr < end; addr += psize) {
+		ptep = huge_pte_alloc(mm, vma, addr, psize);
+		if (!ptep)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		i_mmap_lock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
+		ptl = huge_pte_lock(h, mm, ptep);
+		pte = huge_ptep_get(mm, addr, ptep);
+		make_uffd_wp_huge_pte(vma, addr, ptep, pte);
+		/*
+		 * A none entry has no cached translation, so installing the
+		 * marker needs no TLB flush. Flush only if a fault populated
+		 * the entry between huge_pte_alloc() and the page table lock.
+		 */
+		if (!huge_pte_none(pte))
+			flush_hugetlb_tlb_range(vma, addr, addr + psize);
+		spin_unlock(ptl);
+		i_mmap_unlock_write(vma->vm_file->f_mapping);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
 #else
 #define pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry NULL
+static int pagemap_scan_hugetlb_hole_wp(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+					unsigned long addr, unsigned long end)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
 #endif
 
 static int pagemap_scan_pte_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
@@ -2998,7 +3052,10 @@ static int pagemap_scan_pte_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
 	if (~p->arg.flags & PM_SCAN_WP_MATCHING)
 		return ret;
 
-	err = uffd_wp_range(vma, addr, end - addr, true);
+	if (is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma))
+		err = pagemap_scan_hugetlb_hole_wp(vma, addr, end);
+	else
+		err = uffd_wp_range(vma, addr, end - addr, true);
 	if (err < 0)
 		ret = err;
 
-- 
2.54.0

Re: [PATCH 1/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race

[Lorenzo Stoakes]

On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 06:23:25PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() arms the UFFD_WP bit on a present HugeTLB PTE by
> calling huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() with a ptent snapshot that was
> fetched without the corresponding huge_ptep_modify_prot_start().

The
> start helper is what atomically clears the entry so the kernel-owned
> snapshot stays consistent until the commit; without it, the hardware
> may set Dirty or Accessed in the live PTE between the original read
> and the commit, and huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() (whose generic
> implementation just calls set_huge_pte_at()) then writes the stale
> snapshot back over the live hardware bits, losing the update.

Very pedantic nit - this is a mammoth paragraph :P maybe add a linebreak
where I did above?

>
> The non-hugetlb sibling make_uffd_wp_pte() does this correctly via
> ptep_modify_prot_start() / ptep_modify_prot_commit(). Mirror that
> pattern for the present-PTE branch. The migration case stays as-is --
> migration entries are non-present, so there's no hardware update to
> race against.
>
> Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")

I wonder if better as a separate patch? Not sure what Andrew thinks about
it, I do recall him complaining about separate-hotfixes-as-part-of-a-series :>)

> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>

LGTM, so:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>

> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 1e3a15bf46f4..e21a38ac745b 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -2610,12 +2610,16 @@ static void make_uffd_wp_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (softleaf_is_hwpoison(entry) || softleaf_is_marker(entry))
>  		return;
>
> -	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry))
> +	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
>  		set_huge_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep,
>  				pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(ptent), psize);
> -	else
> -		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, ptent,
> -					     huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(ptent));
> +	} else {
> +		pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
> +
> +		old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
> +		new_pte = huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(old_pte);
> +		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, old_pte, new_pte);
> +	}
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
>
> --
> 2.54.0
>

Cheers, Lorenzo

Re: [PATCH 1/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race

[Lorenzo Stoakes]

On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 06:55:43PM +0100, Lorenzo Stoakes wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 06:23:25PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> > Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
>
> I wonder if better as a separate patch? Not sure what Andrew thinks about
> it, I do recall him complaining about separate-hotfixes-as-part-of-a-series :>)

Ahhh it's a series of Fixes: :) ok ignore this then!

Cheers, Lorenzo

Re: [PATCH 2/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: use huge_page_size() in pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry()

[Lorenzo Stoakes]

On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 06:23:26PM +0100, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> The partial-page check compares against HPAGE_SIZE (PMD_SIZE), which
> is wrong for gigantic hugetlb hstates (e.g. 1G). The walker hands the
> callback a huge_page_size()-sized range, never start + HPAGE_SIZE, so
> the comparison always declares it partial and aborts the WP. Compare
> against the actual hstate's page size.
>
> Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>

LGTM, so:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <ljs@kernel.org>

> ---
>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index e21a38ac745b..1489c67e88f7 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -2960,7 +2960,7 @@ static int pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask,
>  	if (~categories & PAGE_IS_WRITTEN)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>
> -	if (end != start + HPAGE_SIZE) {
> +	if (end != start + huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma))) {
>  		/* Partial HugeTLB page WP isn't possible. */
>  		pagemap_scan_backout_range(p, start, end);
>  		p->arg.walk_end = start;
> --
> 2.54.0
>

Re: [PATCH 1/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: fix make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() prot-update race

[Dev Jain]

On 29/05/26 10:53 pm, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> make_uffd_wp_huge_pte() arms the UFFD_WP bit on a present HugeTLB PTE by
> calling huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() with a ptent snapshot that was
> fetched without the corresponding huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(). The
> start helper is what atomically clears the entry so the kernel-owned
> snapshot stays consistent until the commit; without it, the hardware
> may set Dirty or Accessed in the live PTE between the original read
> and the commit, and huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit() (whose generic
> implementation just calls set_huge_pte_at()) then writes the stale
> snapshot back over the live hardware bits, losing the update.
> 
> The non-hugetlb sibling make_uffd_wp_pte() does this correctly via
> ptep_modify_prot_start() / ptep_modify_prot_commit(). Mirror that
> pattern for the present-PTE branch. The migration case stays as-is --
> migration entries are non-present, so there's no hardware update to
> race against.
> 
> Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
> ---

LGTM

Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>


>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 12 ++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 1e3a15bf46f4..e21a38ac745b 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -2610,12 +2610,16 @@ static void make_uffd_wp_huge_pte(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	if (softleaf_is_hwpoison(entry) || softleaf_is_marker(entry))
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry))
> +	if (softleaf_is_migration(entry)) {
>  		set_huge_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, ptep,
>  				pte_swp_mkuffd_wp(ptent), psize);
> -	else
> -		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, ptent,
> -					     huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(ptent));
> +	} else {
> +		pte_t old_pte, new_pte;
> +
> +		old_pte = huge_ptep_modify_prot_start(vma, addr, ptep);
> +		new_pte = huge_pte_mkuffd_wp(old_pte);
> +		huge_ptep_modify_prot_commit(vma, addr, ptep, old_pte, new_pte);
> +	}
>  }
>  #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
>  

Re: [PATCH 2/6] fs/proc/task_mmu: use huge_page_size() in pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry()

[Dev Jain]

On 29/05/26 10:53 pm, Kiryl Shutsemau (Meta) wrote:
> The partial-page check compares against HPAGE_SIZE (PMD_SIZE), which
> is wrong for gigantic hugetlb hstates (e.g. 1G). The walker hands the
> callback a huge_page_size()-sized range, never start + HPAGE_SIZE, so
> the comparison always declares it partial and aborts the WP. Compare
> against the actual hstate's page size.
> 
> Fixes: 52526ca7fdb9 ("fs/proc/task_mmu: implement IOCTL to get and optionally clear info about PTEs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Sashiko AI review <sashiko-bot@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>


>  fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index e21a38ac745b..1489c67e88f7 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -2960,7 +2960,7 @@ static int pagemap_scan_hugetlb_entry(pte_t *ptep, unsigned long hmask,
>  	if (~categories & PAGE_IS_WRITTEN)
>  		goto out_unlock;
>  
> -	if (end != start + HPAGE_SIZE) {
> +	if (end != start + huge_page_size(hstate_vma(vma))) {
>  		/* Partial HugeTLB page WP isn't possible. */
>  		pagemap_scan_backout_range(p, start, end);
>  		p->arg.walk_end = start;