Re: [PATCH 0/15] mm: introduce ANON_VMA_LAZY for deferred anon_vma creation

[Lance Yang <lance.yang@linux.dev>]

On 2026/6/2 10:15, Barry Song wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2026 at 9:46 AM wangtao <tao.wangtao@honor.com> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> You said discussion was welcome, yet when someone offered even a
>> small comment, you refused to continue the discussion.
>>
>> If I had known you would be this inconsistent, I would not have
>> replied to you in the first place.
>>
>> This will be my last reply to you. I will not respond again.
>>
> 
> Hi Tao,
> 
> Please don't walk away from the linux-mm community. I read your
> patchset and found it quite valuable. It not only reduces memory
> overhead, but also eliminates rmap costs for exclusive folios.
> 
> Since I'm not very confident discussing technical topics in English,
> I wrote a blog post in Chinese about your patchset:
> 
> https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/k00tzhTl8HbL3k4G6ev4SA
> 
> I have to admit that I found the implementation quite complex and
> in need of significant improvement. However, I think the underlying
> idea is very interesting and worth exploring further.
> 
> I'm looking forward to seeing a v2 RFC with a cleaner and simpler
> implementation while preserving the core concept.
> 
> Regardless of whether it ultimately gets merged, I hope the discussion
> can continue.

Same here :)

Tao, please don't let this thread get you down. No first RFC is
perfect, and the idea still looks worth discussing :)

Thanks for working on this!

Cheers, Lance