Linux filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] namespace related fixes for 4.10-rc3
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 12:23:18 +1300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziiyijo9.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170107064012.GI1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (Al Viro's message of "Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:40:13 +0000")

Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> writes:

> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 06:29:52AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 07, 2017 at 06:30:05PM +1300, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> > Eric W. Biederman (3):
>> >       mnt: Protect the mountpoint hashtable with mount_lock
>> ACK
>> 
>> >       mnt: Tuck mounts under others instead of creating shadow/side mounts.
>> 
>> NAK; you have reintroduced put_mountpoint() outside of mount lock in there
>> and you've got seriously confused umount side of the things.
>
> PS: details are in my reply (admittedly, sent only ~20 minutes
> before your pull request) to your patch.  Check Message-ID
> <20170107050644.GA12074@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

I suspect that was sent while I was composing my pull request, and the
locking around put_mountpoint I did fail to catch during my rebase.  I
will finish our conversation about that before I resend that patch.

> My apologies for not getting to it yesterday (the patch was posted a couple of
> days ago, AFAICS) - I'd been off-net since Wednesday, just got back
> ;-/

You and Ram Pai had said reasonably pleasant things about a previous
version of that patch.

Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-10 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-07  5:30 [GIT PULL] namespace related fixes for 4.10-rc3 Eric W. Biederman
2017-01-07  6:29 ` Al Viro
2017-01-07  6:40   ` Al Viro
2017-01-10 23:23     ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2017-01-10 23:25 ` [GIT PULL] namespace related fixes for 4.10-rc4 Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ziiyijo9.fsf@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox