From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
jlayton@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/pipe: add pipe_bench microbenchmark
Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 18:43:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahHZPLqAPXhobCQn@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260522-fix_pipe-v2-2-a8b35a78244e@debian.org>
On 05/22, Breno Leitao wrote:
>
> Add a small selftest that stresses pipe->mutex contention by spawning N
> writer threads that hammer a single pipe with multi-page writes, plus M
> reader threads that drain. Each writer records its own write() latency
> samples into a log2-bucketed histogram; main aggregates and prints
> total writes, throughput, average and percentile (p50/p99) latencies,
> and the maximum observed latency.
>
> Pass --memory-pressure to fork stress-ng (--vm 4 --vm-bytes 80%
> --vm-method all) for the duration of the run, so alloc_page() in
> anon_pipe_write() routinely hits direct reclaim. The flag fails
> fast if stress-ng is not on $PATH.
>
> Program print something like the following, for different writes,
> readers, msgsizes and memory pressure:
>
> config: writers=X readers=Y msgsize=Z duration=3 pipe_size=1048576
> memory_pressure=[no|yes]
> writes: total=54451 rate=18150/s
> throughput_MBps: 1134.40
> lat_avg_ns: 275355
> lat_p50_ns_upper: 262143
> lat_p99_ns_upper: 1048575
> lat_max_ns: 2145633
The more tests the better... but since it comes as 2/2, perhaps the changelog
could mention the difference before/after 1/2 according to this test?
Oleg.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-23 16:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 16:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] fs/pipe: reduce pipe->mutex contention by pre-allocating outside the lock Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fs/pipe: pre-allocate pages outside pipe->mutex in anon_pipe_write Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 16:51 ` Jeff Layton
2026-05-22 17:55 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 19:48 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-23 16:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-24 14:30 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-24 14:48 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-24 16:47 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/pipe: add pipe_bench microbenchmark Breno Leitao
2026-05-23 16:43 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2026-05-23 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-22 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fs/pipe: reduce pipe->mutex contention by pre-allocating outside the lock Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahHZPLqAPXhobCQn@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox