From: Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shakeel.butt@linux.dev,
jlayton@kernel.org, axboe@kernel.dk, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] fs/pipe: pre-allocate pages outside pipe->mutex in anon_pipe_write
Date: Sun, 24 May 2026 07:30:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahMK_mWcooqrd9Hc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ahHVM9hCP65hH82S@redhat.com>
On Sat, May 23, 2026 at 06:26:27PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > @@ -566,7 +661,9 @@ anon_pipe_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
> > * after waiting we need to re-check whether the pipe
> > * become empty while we dropped the lock.
> > */
> > + anon_pipe_refill_tmp_pages(pipe, &prealloc);
> > mutex_unlock(&pipe->mutex);
> > + anon_pipe_free_pages(&prealloc);
>
> Do we really want to call anon_pipe_free_pages() at this point?
>
> The main loop will continue when pipe_writable() becomes true again...
I went back and forth on this. The argument for freeing was that
wait_event_interruptible_exclusive() can sleep arbitrarily long (slow or
stopped reader), and holding up the prealloc pages felt antisocial --
especially under the memory pressure this series targets, where those pages are
more useful on the freelists than parked on a sleeping task.
On the other side, on wakeup the loop is guaranteed to want pages again, and
re-entering the allocator under the mutex puts us back in the contended state
the patch removes. For any write() large enough to wait mid-syscall (which is
the workload patch 2/2 measures), keeping them strictly wins on throughput /
p99.
I think your read is the better one -- the throughput case is the whole point
of the series, and the memory-hoarding concern is bounded (8 pages per blocked
writer, freed in the out: path on syscall exit). Will drop the free_pages()
call from the wait branch in v3 and keep only the one after the out: label,
together with the nit from Mateusz.
Thanks for the review,
--breno
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-24 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-22 16:44 [PATCH v2 0/2] fs/pipe: reduce pipe->mutex contention by pre-allocating outside the lock Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] fs/pipe: pre-allocate pages outside pipe->mutex in anon_pipe_write Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 16:51 ` Jeff Layton
2026-05-22 17:55 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 19:48 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-23 16:26 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-24 14:30 ` Breno Leitao [this message]
2026-05-24 14:48 ` Mateusz Guzik
2026-05-24 16:47 ` Breno Leitao
2026-05-22 16:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/pipe: add pipe_bench microbenchmark Breno Leitao
2026-05-23 16:43 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-23 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2026-05-22 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] fs/pipe: reduce pipe->mutex contention by pre-allocating outside the lock Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahMK_mWcooqrd9Hc@gmail.com \
--to=leitao@debian.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox