From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/4] pinctrl: intel: Convert capability list to features
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 15:45:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210108134556.GM4077@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210108131138.GB968855@lahna.fi.intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 03:11:38PM +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 02:51:09PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:46 PM Mika Westerberg
> > <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> wrote:
...
> > What about solving the issue when it comes?
>
> Up to you :)
I have sent v2 with dropped patch 3 and added your tag for patches 1 and 2.
Please, review the patch 3 which is basically kept unchanged.
Thanks!
> > > IMHO it is always good idea to avoid possible infinite loops
> > > especially in the kernel space.
> >
> > But do PCI / xHCI (the first two that came to my mind) have something like this?
>
> Yes they do, at least PCI. I would expect xHCI to have it too as the
> hardware can be hot removed in the middle of a capability list walk
> returning 1's on subsequent reads.
Good to know.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-08 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-07 19:01 [PATCH v1 1/4] pinctrl: intel: Split intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-07 19:01 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] pinctrl: intel: Drop unnecessary check for predefined features Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 7:08 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-01-07 19:01 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] pinctrl: intel: Convert revision conditional to switch-case Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 7:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-01-07 19:02 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] pinctrl: intel: Convert capability list to features Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 7:07 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-01-08 12:22 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 12:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 12:46 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-01-08 12:51 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-01-08 13:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2021-01-08 13:45 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-01-08 7:07 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] pinctrl: intel: Split intel_pinctrl_add_padgroups() for better maintenance Mika Westerberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210108134556.GM4077@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox