* [PATCH v2] gpio: cdev: check if uAPI v2 config attributes are correctly zeroed
@ 2026-05-20 7:42 Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-20 11:28 ` Kent Gibson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Bartosz Golaszewski @ 2026-05-20 7:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski, Kent Gibson, Linus Walleij
Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Bartosz Golaszewski
We check the padding of other uAPI v2 structures but not that of line
config attributes. For used attributes: check if their padding is
zeroed, for unused: check if the entire structure is zeroed.
Fixes: 3c0d9c635ae2 ("gpiolib: cdev: support GPIO_V2_GET_LINE_IOCTL and GPIO_V2_LINE_GET_VALUES_IOCTL")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Make checking even stricter: check if padding is zeroed for used
attributes, for unused ones: check if the entire struct is zeroed
- Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260519-gpio-cdev-attr-padding-check-v1-1-a0c6d4a698bf@oss.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
index f36b7c06996d70b2286edbd181899e4c572b9086..edbcc86e4b26f88036ed12c13055bb2c371fb6a3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
@@ -1194,6 +1194,15 @@ static int gpio_v2_line_config_validate(struct gpio_v2_line_config *lc,
if (!mem_is_zero(lc->padding, sizeof(lc->padding)))
return -EINVAL;
+ for (i = 0; i < lc->num_attrs; i++) {
+ if (lc->attrs[i].attr.padding != 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!mem_is_zero(&lc->attrs[i],
+ (GPIO_V2_LINE_NUM_ATTRS_MAX - lc->num_attrs) * sizeof(*lc->attrs)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
for (i = 0; i < num_lines; i++) {
flags = gpio_v2_line_config_flags(lc, i);
ret = gpio_v2_line_flags_validate(flags);
---
base-commit: 6a50ba100ace43f43c87384367eb2d2605fcc16c
change-id: 20260519-gpio-cdev-attr-padding-check-7e52c98a3de7
Best regards,
--
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: cdev: check if uAPI v2 config attributes are correctly zeroed
2026-05-20 7:42 [PATCH v2] gpio: cdev: check if uAPI v2 config attributes are correctly zeroed Bartosz Golaszewski
@ 2026-05-20 11:28 ` Kent Gibson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kent Gibson @ 2026-05-20 11:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bartosz Golaszewski
Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski, Linus Walleij, linux-gpio, linux-kernel
On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 09:42:10AM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> We check the padding of other uAPI v2 structures but not that of line
> config attributes. For used attributes: check if their padding is
> zeroed, for unused: check if the entire structure is zeroed.
>
> Fixes: 3c0d9c635ae2 ("gpiolib: cdev: support GPIO_V2_GET_LINE_IOCTL and GPIO_V2_LINE_GET_VALUES_IOCTL")
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Make checking even stricter: check if padding is zeroed for used
> attributes, for unused ones: check if the entire struct is zeroed
> - Link to v1: https://patch.msgid.link/20260519-gpio-cdev-attr-padding-check-v1-1-a0c6d4a698bf@oss.qualcomm.com
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> index f36b7c06996d70b2286edbd181899e4c572b9086..edbcc86e4b26f88036ed12c13055bb2c371fb6a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
> @@ -1194,6 +1194,15 @@ static int gpio_v2_line_config_validate(struct gpio_v2_line_config *lc,
> if (!mem_is_zero(lc->padding, sizeof(lc->padding)))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + for (i = 0; i < lc->num_attrs; i++) {
> + if (lc->attrs[i].attr.padding != 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
That works for me - the explict test against 0 makes the intent as clear
as a mem_is_zero() call. For me anyway.
> + if (!mem_is_zero(&lc->attrs[i],
> + (GPIO_V2_LINE_NUM_ATTRS_MAX - lc->num_attrs) * sizeof(*lc->attrs)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
Dislike the use of i here.
lc->num_attrs would remove the implicit dependency on the preceeding loop.
I'm also uncomfortable with the lc->num_attrs == GPIO_V2_LINE_NUM_ATTRS_MAX
case as the pointer is out of range. The size is 0 so it probably wont get
dereferenced, but just passing it around makes my skin crawl.
Perhaps put the size in a var and only call mem_is_zero() if size > 0?
Cheers,
Kent.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-20 11:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-20 7:42 [PATCH v2] gpio: cdev: check if uAPI v2 config attributes are correctly zeroed Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-05-20 11:28 ` Kent Gibson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox