From: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: pch: use raw_spinlock_t for the register lock
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2026 09:41:29 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260723014129.1129730-1-junjie.cao@intel.com> (raw)
pch_irq_type() is registered as the irq_chip .irq_set_type callback and
takes chip->spinlock with spin_lock_irqsave(). This callback is reached
from __setup_irq() -> __irq_set_trigger() -> chip->irq_set_type() while
the caller holds desc->lock, a raw_spinlock_t, with hardirqs disabled.
That context is not sleepable, but on PREEMPT_RT a regular spinlock_t is
an rtmutex-backed sleeping lock, so acquiring it there is invalid.
This was confirmed on a PREEMPT_RT kernel with lockdep
(PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING and DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP). A grounded PoC mirrored
pch_irq_type()'s locking and drove it through the real genirq carrier
irq_set_irq_type() -> __irq_set_trigger() -> chip->irq_set_type(), i.e.
the same __irq_set_trigger() edge that __setup_irq() takes for a
requested IRQ. With the original spin_lock_irqsave() edge lockdep
reported an invalid wait context, immediately followed by:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:48
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 1, non_block: 0, pid: 95, name: insmod
hardirqs last disabled at (3784): _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4f/0x60
rt_spin_lock+0x3a/0x1c0
repro_irq_set_type+0x64/0xa0 [pch_repro]
__irq_set_trigger+0x69/0x140
irq_set_irq_type+0x78/0xd0
Switching the mirrored lock to raw_spinlock_t made both splats go away.
Convert the register lock to raw_spinlock_t. The same lock also
serializes the GPIO direction/value callbacks and the suspend/resume
register save/restore, but all of those critical sections only perform
MMIO register accesses (ioread32()/iowrite32()) and
irq_set_handler_locked(); none of them contain sleepable operations.
Keeping this register lock non-sleeping is therefore appropriate for the
irqchip callbacks and does not change the GPIO-side locking contract.
This is the same class of issue and fix as recently addressed for other
GPIO controllers, e.g. commit 286533cb14a3 ("gpio: sch: use raw_spinlock_t
in the irq startup path") and commit 90f0109019e6 ("gpio: eic-sprd: use
raw_spinlock_t in the irq startup path").
Fixes: 38eb18a6f92d ("gpio-pch: Support interrupt function")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
index 4ffa0955a9e3..07a5617b314b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pch.c
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ struct pch_gpio {
struct pch_gpio_reg_data pch_gpio_reg;
int irq_base;
enum pch_type_t ioh;
- spinlock_t spinlock;
+ raw_spinlock_t spinlock;
};
static int pch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned int nr, int val)
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned int nr, int val)
struct pch_gpio *chip = gpiochip_get_data(gpio);
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
reg_val = ioread32(&chip->reg->po);
if (val)
reg_val |= BIT(nr);
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned int nr, int val)
reg_val &= ~BIT(nr);
iowrite32(reg_val, &chip->reg->po);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned int nr,
u32 reg_val;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
reg_val = ioread32(&chip->reg->po);
if (val)
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned int nr,
pm |= BIT(nr);
iowrite32(pm, &chip->reg->pm);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -158,12 +158,12 @@ static int pch_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *gpio, unsigned int nr)
u32 pm;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
pm = ioread32(&chip->reg->pm);
pm &= BIT(gpio_pins[chip->ioh]) - 1;
pm &= ~BIT(nr);
iowrite32(pm, &chip->reg->pm);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int pch_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
return 0;
}
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
/* Set interrupt mode */
im = ioread32(im_reg) & ~(PCH_IM_MASK << (im_pos * 4));
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@ static int pch_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
else if (type & IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH)
irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_edge_irq);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int pch_gpio_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
chip->ioh = id->driver_data;
chip->reg = chip->base;
pci_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
- spin_lock_init(&chip->spinlock);
+ raw_spin_lock_init(&chip->spinlock);
pch_gpio_setup(chip);
ret = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &chip->gpio, chip);
@@ -407,9 +407,9 @@ static int pch_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct pch_gpio *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
pch_gpio_save_reg_conf(chip);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -419,11 +419,11 @@ static int pch_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
struct pch_gpio *chip = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&chip->spinlock, flags);
iowrite32(0x01, &chip->reg->reset);
iowrite32(0x00, &chip->reg->reset);
pch_gpio_restore_reg_conf(chip);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&chip->spinlock, flags);
return 0;
}
--
2.43.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-07-23 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-23 1:41 Junjie Cao [this message]
2026-07-25 9:50 ` [PATCH] gpio: pch: use raw_spinlock_t for the register lock Linus Walleij
2026-07-27 15:18 ` Junjie Cao
2026-07-29 7:22 ` Linus Walleij
2026-07-27 13:08 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260723014129.1129730-1-junjie.cao@intel.com \
--to=junjie.cao@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox