From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Trigger hwirq0 for interrupt-lines without a mapping
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 22:40:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd3rMkD9cX+6Bt9b@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220104164238.253142-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 05:42:38PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Commit bdfbef2d29dc ("pinctrl: cherryview: Don't use selection 0 to mark
> an interrupt line as unused") made the code properly differentiate
> between unset vs (hwirq) 0 entries in the GPIO-controller interrupt-line
> to GPIO pinnumber/hwirq mapping.
>
> This is causing some boards to not boot. This commit restores the old
> behavior of triggering hwirq 0 when receiving an interrupt on an
> interrupt-line for which there is no mapping.
I conducted a research and, on the board Jarkko has issues with, all
mentioned pins are floating.
[ 3.556875] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: interrupt on unmapped interrupt line 0
(I believe this matches to 76 below)
[ 37.287821] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:03: using interrupt line 0 for pin 81
[ 37.371456] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:02: using interrupt line 0 for pin 22
[ 37.389548] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:03: using interrupt line 2 for pin 77
[ 37.407050] cherryview-pinctrl INT33FF:00: using interrupt line 0 for pin 76
Two of them are designated for SD card and Audio Daughter board.
But in all cases is seems like PCB error, unfortunately.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-04 16:42 [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Trigger hwirq0 for interrupt-lines without a mapping Hans de Goede
2022-01-04 16:57 ` Mika Westerberg
2022-01-04 21:30 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-01-16 1:01 ` Linus Walleij
2022-01-16 9:38 ` Hans de Goede
2022-01-11 20:40 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2022-01-12 19:11 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yd3rMkD9cX+6Bt9b@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox