Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] i2c: designware: fix probe ordering for AMD GPIO on Lenovo Yoga 7 14AGP11

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>]

On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 10:38:57PM +0530, Hardik Prakash wrote:
> On Sat, May 17, 2026 at 15:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 09:45:15PM +0530, Hardik Prakash wrote:
> > > v3:
> > >  - Patch 2 only (patch 1 already in Linus Walleij's tree)
> >
> > The patch numbering is broken. Where did 2/2 come from?
> 
> Both patches are committed in my local tree. git format-patch counted
> both commits and numbered this 2/2. I excluded the 0001 file from the
> git send-email call since patch 1 is already in Linus Walleij's tree,
> but the numbering carried over from the two-commit series.

Don't do like this. New version should use proper --base and hence be only
1 patch. We do not confuse people by ghost patches.

> Apologies for the confusion. If preferred I can resend with 1/1
> numbering by dropping patch 1 from my local branch before running
> format-patch.

Make sure you base your tree on the official Linus Walleij's one, this will be
depicted in the cover letter when you supply proper --base to git-format-patch.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko