Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip"

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1453 bytes --]

On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 27. Juni 2017, 15:01:32 CEST schrieb Thomas Gleixner:
> > The only irq chip function which uses the regmap magic is the
> > irq_set_type() callback. Now, I have a hard time to understand (though I'm
> > no regmap/pinctrl expert) why that regmap stuff needs to be called in the
> > first place. The level and the polarity are programmed via:
> > 
> >         writel_relaxed(level, gc->reg_base + GPIO_INTTYPE_LEVEL);
> >         writel_relaxed(polarity, gc->reg_base + GPIO_INT_POLARITY);
> > 
> > Why needs the regmap machinery to be invoked there? The GPIO is already
> > muxed and configured as interrupt, otherwise none of the irq functions
> > could be invoked. Hmm?
> 
> That is a safeguard against the pinmux not being set as "gpio" but some other 
> function, if the irq is requested directly without going through the gpio API. 
> 
> But looking at struct irq_chip and also other pinctrl drivers again, it seems
> the new [0] irq_request_resources might be the way saner place for this.
> Especially as it also prevents the mux-setting from being called more than 
> once.

That'll fail on RT as well because irq_request_resources() is called with
irq_desc->lock held and interrupts disabled.

irq_request_resources() can probably be called without holding desc->lock,
though we need some form of protection against concurrent irq
requests/free. I'll have look into that.

Thanks,

	tglx