From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Long Zhao" <longzhao@ambarella.com>, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 10/13] gpio: pl061: switch data path to gpio-regmap
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2026 07:10:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-193002@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261102-cv75-gpio-v13-10-4f93114ea204@ambarella.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] gpio: pl061: dropping IRQ resource helpers breaks IRQ locking and unbind
--
commit 074c89211872cf47652e8bf1f251d42902b7bc3b
Author: Long Zhao <longzhao@ambarella.com>
gpio: pl061: switch data path to gpio-regmap
This commit switches the PL061 GPIO data path callbacks (get, set, and
direction) to use the gpio-regmap helper library while keeping a custom
irq_chip and instantiating an external irq_domain for gpio-regmap to attach.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> index 27ed759486caf..cb1ef0f3774c1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -229,54 +198,47 @@ static int pl061_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned trigger)
[ ... ]
> static void pl061_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> - struct pl061 *pl061 = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> - u8 mask = BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) % PL061_GPIO_NR);
> + struct pl061 *pl061 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + unsigned int mask = pl061_line_mask(pl061, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
>
> - scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &pl061->lock)
> - regmap_clear_bits(pl061->regmap, GPIOIE, mask);
> -
> - gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
> + regmap_clear_bits(pl061->regmap, pl061->data->regs->ie, mask);
> }
>
> static void pl061_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> - struct pl061 *pl061 = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> - u8 mask = BIT(irqd_to_hwirq(d) % PL061_GPIO_NR);
> -
> - gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, d->hwirq);
> + struct pl061 *pl061 = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> + unsigned int mask = pl061_line_mask(pl061, irqd_to_hwirq(d));
>
> - scoped_guard(raw_spinlock, &pl061->lock)
> - regmap_set_bits(pl061->regmap, GPIOIE, mask);
> + regmap_set_bits(pl061->regmap, pl061->data->regs->ie, mask);
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -320,67 +280,169 @@ static const struct irq_chip pl061_irq_chip = {
> .irq_set_wake = pl061_irq_set_wake,
> .irq_print_chip = pl061_irq_print_chip,
> .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
> - GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
> +};
[ ... ]
> + if (irq) {
> + const struct irq_domain_info info = {
> + .fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev),
> + .size = data->ngpio,
> + .hwirq_max = data->ngpio,
> + .ops = &pl061_irq_domain_ops,
> + .host_data = pl061,
> + };
> +
> + pl061->irq_domain = devm_irq_domain_instantiate(dev, &info);
> + if (IS_ERR(pl061->irq_domain))
> + return PTR_ERR(pl061->irq_domain);
> +
> + /*
> + * Registered before the gpiochip so unbind runs it after
> + * gpiochip_free_remaining_irqs(), while the domain is still
> + * alive. devm removes the domain after this action.
> + */
> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, pl061_dispose_irq_mappings, pl061);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
[Severity: High]
As reported by Sashiko on v11 [1], does dropping GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS
from pl061_irq_chip and removing gpiochip_disable_irq() and
gpiochip_enable_irq() from pl061_irq_mask() and pl061_irq_unmask() introduce
regressions during device unbind and GPIO direction changes?
Without gpiochip_reqres_irq() and gpiochip_relres_irq(),
GPIOD_FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ and GPIOD_FLAG_IRQ_IS_ENABLED are never set on the GPIO
descriptors.
On device unbind while an interrupt is requested (for example via userspace
cdev edge detection in edge_detector_setup() -> request_threaded_irq() or an
in-kernel consumer), devm_gpio_regmap_unregister() -> gpiochip_remove() ->
gpiochip_free_remaining_irqs() only frees descriptors that have
GPIOD_FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ set:
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:gpiochip_free_remaining_irqs() {
for_each_gpio_desc_with_flag(gc, desc, GPIOD_FLAG_USED_AS_IRQ) {
...
}
}
Because that flag is never set, gpiochip_free_remaining_irqs() becomes a no-op
despite the comment in pl061_probe() above devm_add_action_or_reset(). Next,
pl061_dispose_irq_mappings() calls irq_dispose_mapping() -> irq_free_desc()
while desc->action and any threaded handler are still active. This triggers a
warning in remove_proc_entry() on /proc/irq/<virq> and frees the irq_desc.
When the consumer later calls free_irq() (such as on closing the GPIO character
device file descriptor), irq_to_desc(virq) returns NULL, leaking the irqaction
and leaving the edge_irq_thread kthread running with a dangling dev_id pointer
to the freed struct line.
In addition, without these helpers:
- gpiochip_lock_as_irq() is not called when an interrupt is requested, so
requesting an IRQ on a line configured as a push-pull output is no longer
rejected.
- gpiod_direction_output() no longer prevents switching a line with an active
interrupt to output mode.
- Module reference counting in gpiochip_reqres_irq() and gpiochip_relres_irq()
is bypassed.
Although the commit message compares this with gpio-idio-16,
gpio-pcie-idio-24, and gpio-104-idi-48, those drivers use fixed-direction
inputs for their interrupt-capable lines and did not previously use
GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS, whereas PL061 lines have software-configurable
direction.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261020-cv75-gpio-v11-8-e058bae19571@ambarella.com
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261102-cv75-gpio-v13-0-4f93114ea204@ambarella.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-02 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-02 6:45 [PATCH v13 00/13] gpio: add Ambarella CV75 PL061 support Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:45 ` [PATCH v13 01/13] dt-bindings: gpio: pl061: add Ambarella CV75 variant Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 6:45 ` [PATCH v13 02/13] gpiolib: regmap: add GPIO_REGMAP_QUIRK_SET_AFTER_DIR Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 7:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-02 8:35 ` Michael Walle
2026-11-02 6:45 ` [PATCH v13 03/13] gpio: pl061: drop redundant pending check in the IRQ handler Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:45 ` [PATCH v13 04/13] gpio: pl061: convert register access to regmap Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:45 ` [PATCH v13 05/13] gpio: pl061: use IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_MASK and IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:45 ` [PATCH v13 06/13] gpio: pl061: use cleanup helpers for locks Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:46 ` [PATCH v13 07/13] gpio: pl061: keep the parent device in a local Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:46 ` [PATCH v13 08/13] gpio: regmap: remove gpiochip before tearing down irqchip Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 8:33 ` Michael Walle
2026-11-02 6:46 ` [PATCH v13 09/13] gpiolib: request ACPI GPIO events for external IRQ domains Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:46 ` [PATCH v13 10/13] gpio: pl061: switch data path to gpio-regmap Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 7:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-02 6:46 ` [PATCH v13 11/13] gpio: pl061: add Ambarella register-layout variant Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:46 ` [PATCH v13 12/13] gpio: pl061: tidy up IRQ trigger logging Long Zhao via B4 Relay
2026-11-02 6:46 ` [PATCH v13 13/13] gpio: pl061: use string_choices helpers for " Long Zhao via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-193002@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longzhao@ambarella.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox