From: M Taylor <mctylr@privacy.nb.ca>
To: A Gilmore <agilmore@shaw.ca>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: transparent internet via radio
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 15:06:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030825150606.A17749@pull.privacy.nb.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1061769408.1126.98.camel@fluid.redwork.net>; from agilmore@shaw.ca on Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:49PM -0700
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:49PM -0700, A Gilmore wrote:
> Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
> into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
> providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
>
> So I started looking into radio. I will have one LAN with broadband
> internet, and remote LANs without any internet access. The idea is to
>
> Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
> Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
> transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
> interfacing the protocols?
Are you a licensed amateur radio (ham) operator? You don't mention
a callsign, and some of your questions seem quite basic regarding
VHF & higher propagation, which suggests perhaps you are not.
Amateur radio in Canada and elsewhere has content restrictions and
is for non-commercial usage, which are not agreeable to most people's
general Internet usage. So for general wireless Internet access,
I suspect that the amateur radio solution is not the best general
solution.
I would suggest looking into license-free/exempt "WiFi" or 802.11(b)
wireless ethernet. These are low cost (cheaper than a commercial TNC
in most cases) devices provide low power (often 100mW) 2.4 GHz
(microwave) with speeds up to 11Mbps (802.11b) or higher (802.11g).
With a clear line of sight, and a small directional antenna
you can easily get a stable connection over 10km or more.
I would not recommend consumer oriented 802.11b for a Wireless ISP
(WISP) as they tend to have serious issues scaling, and the
license-free status means you must tolerate intereference.
See BC Wireless for more Canadian specific information:
<http://www.bcwireless.net/>
-ve1mct
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-25 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-24 23:56 transparent internet via radio A Gilmore
2003-08-25 0:14 ` Andrew Bates
2003-08-25 2:58 ` Bob Nielsen
2003-08-26 14:18 ` John Feist
2003-08-25 14:06 ` M Taylor [this message]
2003-08-25 14:41 ` Dennis Boone
2003-08-25 18:35 ` Jeroen Vreeken
2003-08-25 19:54 ` Jaime Robles
2003-08-25 20:31 ` Dennis Boone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030825150606.A17749@pull.privacy.nb.ca \
--to=mctylr@privacy.nb.ca \
--cc=agilmore@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox