Linux HAM/Amateur Radio development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gordon JC Pearc e <gordonjcp@gjcp.net>
To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Cc: debian-hams@lists.debian.org, node@packages.debian.org,
	nodejs@packages.debian.org
Subject: Re: Node.js and it's future in debian
Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 20:48:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FA2E108.2060806@gjcp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120503185129.GA18768@burratino>

On 03/05/12 19:51, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
. Which package should use the name "node" in the long term?  What
 >      can we do to ensure that happens eventually?
 >
 >      (My answer is that I hope that neither uses the name "node" in
 >      the long term.)

Exactly.  It's a stupidly common term, probably only slightly better 
than calling it "program".

I don't buy into this idea that changing it will break all sorts of 
legacy scripts.  If they are that fragile and undocumented, *get rid of 
them*!  Undocumented fragile code is a liability.  Kill it now, under 
"known" circumstances, and fix it up properly.

-- 
Gordonjcp MM0YEQ

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-03 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CACxjfDH5zYth6Q-ZDLDafqNEczbF3BqaGRcAhsaiPEnApbiUuA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20120501205524.GI30521@flying-gecko.net>
     [not found]   ` <20120501215305.GA1250@burratino>
     [not found]     ` <20120501221659.GA11430@flying-gecko.net>
     [not found]       ` <20120502065003.GB2410@burratino>
     [not found]         ` <20120502165031.GC7390@flying-gecko.net>
     [not found]           ` <20120502171349.GA23806@burratino>
2012-05-02 20:04             ` Node.js and it's future in debian Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-02 20:31               ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-05-03 15:29               ` David Ranch
2012-05-03 15:33               ` David Ranch
2012-05-03 16:17                 ` Marius Petrescu
2012-05-03 17:08                   ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-03 17:05                 ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-03 18:51                   ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-05-03 19:48                     ` Gordon JC Pearc e [this message]
2012-05-03 23:10                     ` Hans-Peter F. Oeste
2012-05-04  4:09                     ` David Ranch
2012-05-04  4:28                       ` Ray Wells
2012-05-04  4:46                       ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-05-04 12:31                   ` DL1SIG
2012-05-04 13:29                     ` [Pkg-javascript-devel] " Emilien Klein
2012-05-04 14:31                     ` Patrick Ouellette
2012-05-04  7:38               ` walter harms

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FA2E108.2060806@gjcp.net \
    --to=gordonjcp@gjcp.net \
    --cc=debian-hams@lists.debian.org \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=node@packages.debian.org \
    --cc=nodejs@packages.debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox