Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: add prototype for __fortify_panic()

[Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>]

On 29.05.24 г. 21:09 ч., Jeff Johnson wrote:
> As discussed in [1] add a prototype for __fortify_panic() to fix the
> 'make W=1 C=1' warning:
> 
> arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c:535:6: warning: symbol '__fortify_panic' was not declared. Should it be static?

Actually doesn't it make sense to have this defined under ../string.h ? 
Actually given that we don't have any string fortification under the 
boot/  why have the fortify _* functions at all ?

> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/79653cc7-6e59-4657-9c0a-76f49f49d019@quicinc.com/ [1]
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
> ---
>   arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> index b353a7be380c..3a56138484a9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ void __putdec(unsigned long value);
>   #define error_putstr(__x)  __putstr(__x)
>   #define error_puthex(__x)  __puthex(__x)
>   #define error_putdec(__x)  __putdec(__x)
> +void __fortify_panic(const u8 reason, size_t avail, size_t size);
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_X86_VERBOSE_BOOTUP
>   
> 
> ---
> base-commit: e0cce98fe279b64f4a7d81b7f5c3a23d80b92fbc
> change-id: 20240529-fortify_panic-325601efe71d
> 
>