public inbox for linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
	 Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>,
	Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	 linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: add check for snprintf to scnprintf
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 17:05:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bccc704fc78b362bbc57a79eb240219f5ec1548e.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240221-snprintf-checkpatch-v2-1-9baeb59dae30@google.com>

On Wed, 2024-02-21 at 22:11 +0000, Justin Stitt wrote:
> I am going to quote Lee Jones who has been doing some snprintf ->
> scnprintf refactorings:
> 
> "There is a general misunderstanding amongst engineers that
> {v}snprintf() returns the length of the data *actually* encoded into the
> destination array.  However, as per the C99 standard {v}snprintf()
> really returns the length of the data that *would have been* written if
> there were enough space for it.  This misunderstanding has led to
> buffer-overruns in the past.  It's generally considered safer to use the
> {v}scnprintf() variants in their place (or even sprintf() in simple
> cases).  So let's do that."
> 
> To help prevent new instances of snprintf() from popping up, let's add a
> check to checkpatch.pl.
> 
> Suggested-by: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
> Signed-off-by: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Had a vim moment and deleted a character before sending the patch.
> - Replaced the character :)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240221-snprintf-checkpatch-v1-1-3ac5025b5961@google.com
> ---
> From a discussion here [1].
> 
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/0f9c95f9-2c14-eee6-7faf-635880edcea4@linux-m68k.org/

> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
[]
> @@ -7012,6 +7012,12 @@ sub process {
>  			     "Prefer strscpy, strscpy_pad, or __nonstring over strncpy - see: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/90\n" . $herecurr);
>  		}
>  
> +# snprintf uses that should likely be {v}scnprintf
> +		if ($line =~ /\bsnprintf\s*\(\s*/) {
> +				WARN("SNPRINTF",
> +				     "Prefer scnprintf over snprintf\n" . $herecurr);

There really should be some sort of reference link here
similar to the one above this.

Also, I rather doubt _all_ of these should be changed just
for churn's sake.

Maybe add a test for some return value use like

		if (defined($stat) &&
		    $stat =~ /$Lval\s*=\s*snprintf\s*\(/) {
			etc...

Maybe offer to --fix it too.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-22  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-02-21 22:11 [PATCH v2] checkpatch: add check for snprintf to scnprintf Justin Stitt
2024-02-21 22:33 ` Kees Cook
2024-02-22  1:05 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2024-02-23 10:38   ` Lee Jones
2024-02-23 12:47     ` Joe Perches
2024-02-22 22:30 ` David Laight
2024-02-23 10:41   ` Lee Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bccc704fc78b362bbc57a79eb240219f5ec1548e.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=apw@canonical.com \
    --cc=dwaipayanray1@gmail.com \
    --cc=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox