From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, will@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Liz Prucka <lizprucka@google.com>,
Seth Jenkins <sethjenkins@google.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64: mm: Don't abuse memblock NOMAP to check for overlaps
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2026 10:21:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0f2df03-21da-473f-ab89-64a964c18f08@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260126092630.1800589-20-ardb+git@google.com>
On 26/01/2026 09:26, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
>
> Now that the DRAM mapping routines respect existing table mappings and
> contiguous block and page mappings, it is no longer needed to fiddle
> with the memblock tables to set and clear the NOMAP attribute. Instead,
> map the kernel text and rodata alias first, avoiding contiguous
> mappings, so that they will not be added later when mapping the
> memblocks.
Should we do something similar for kfence? Currently we have
arm64_kfence_alloc_pool() which marks some memory NOMAP then
arm64_kfence_map_pool() which PTE-maps it and clears NOMAP. Presumably we could
rationalize into a single function that does it all, prior to mapping the bulk
of the linear map?
>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 27 ++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> index 80587cd47ce7..18415d4743bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -1149,12 +1149,17 @@ static void __init map_mem(void)
> flags |= NO_BLOCK_MAPPINGS | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS;
>
> /*
> - * Take care not to create a writable alias for the
> - * read-only text and rodata sections of the kernel image.
> - * So temporarily mark them as NOMAP to skip mappings in
> - * the following for-loop
> + * Map the linear alias of the [_text, __init_begin) interval
> + * as non-executable now, and remove the write permission in
> + * mark_linear_text_alias_ro() above (which will be called after
> + * alternative patching has completed). This makes the contents
> + * of the region accessible to subsystems such as hibernate,
> + * but protects it from inadvertent modification or execution.
> + * Note that contiguous mappings cannot be remapped in this way,
> + * so we should avoid them here.
> */
> - memblock_mark_nomap(kernel_start, kernel_end - kernel_start);
> + __map_memblock(kernel_start, kernel_end, PAGE_KERNEL,
> + flags | NO_CONT_MAPPINGS);
So the reason to disallow cont mappings is because we need to modify the
permissions later? It _is_ safe to change permissions on a live contiguous
mapping in this way. That was clarified in the architecture a couple of years
back and we rely on it for contpte_wrprotect_ptes(); see comment there.
I think we could relax this?
Thanks,
Ryan
>
> /* map all the memory banks */
> for_each_mem_range(i, &start, &end) {
> @@ -1167,18 +1172,6 @@ static void __init map_mem(void)
> flags);
> }
>
> - /*
> - * Map the linear alias of the [_text, __init_begin) interval
> - * as non-executable now, and remove the write permission in
> - * mark_linear_text_alias_ro() below (which will be called after
> - * alternative patching has completed). This makes the contents
> - * of the region accessible to subsystems such as hibernate,
> - * but protects it from inadvertent modification or execution.
> - * Note that contiguous mappings cannot be remapped in this way,
> - * so we should avoid them here.
> - */
> - __map_memblock(kernel_start, kernel_end, PAGE_KERNEL, NO_CONT_MAPPINGS);
> - memblock_clear_nomap(kernel_start, kernel_end - kernel_start);
> arm64_kfence_map_pool(early_kfence_pool);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-27 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-26 9:26 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: Unmap linear alias of kernel data/bss Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64: Move the zero page to rodata Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 9:34 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 9:49 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:03 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 10:50 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64: Move fixmap page tables to end of kernel image Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 9:42 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] arm64: mm: Permit contiguous descriptors to be rewritten Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 9:45 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 15:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 16:59 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 17:02 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 17:37 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64: mm: Preserve existing table mappings when mapping DRAM Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 9:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64: mm: Preserve non-contiguous descriptors " Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 9:58 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64: mm: Remove bogus stop condition from map_mem() loop Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:06 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64: mm: Drop redundant pgd_t* argument from map_mem() Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:10 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64: mm: Don't abuse memblock NOMAP to check for overlaps Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:21 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2026-01-27 10:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:39 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 10:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 11:00 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 11:03 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 11:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64: mm: Map the kernel data/bss read-only in the linear map Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:33 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 10:36 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:41 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-26 9:26 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64: mm: Unmap kernel data/bss entirely from " Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 10:50 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-01-27 10:54 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2026-01-27 11:02 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0f2df03-21da-473f-ab89-64a964c18f08@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb+git@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizprucka@google.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=sethjenkins@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox