* [PATCHv2] platform/x86/intel/tpmi/plr: allocate die_info with plr
@ 2026-05-21 1:46 Rosen Penev
2026-05-21 10:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rosen Penev @ 2026-05-21 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: platform-driver-x86
Cc: Hans de Goede, Ilpo Järvinen, Kees Cook, Gustavo A. R. Silva,
open list,
open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not covered by other areas):Keyword:b__counted_by(_le|_be|_ptr)?b
Simplifies allocations slightly.
Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis.
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
---
v2: Rebase.
drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c | 12 ++----------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
index 8faecc311038..66220fadf670 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
@@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ struct tpmi_plr_die {
struct tpmi_plr {
struct dentry *dbgfs_dir;
- struct tpmi_plr_die *die_info;
int num_dies;
struct auxiliary_device *auxdev;
struct notifier_block nb;
struct mutex lock; /* Protect access to dbgfs_dir */
+ struct tpmi_plr_die die_info[] __counted_by(num_dies);
};
static const char * const plr_coarse_reasons[] = {
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const struct auxilia
if (!num_resources)
return -EINVAL;
- plr = devm_kzalloc(&auxdev->dev, sizeof(*plr), GFP_KERNEL);
+ plr = devm_kzalloc(&auxdev->dev, struct_size(plr, die_info, num_resources), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!plr)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -315,13 +315,6 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const struct auxilia
intel_plr_register_notifier(&plr->nb);
- plr->die_info = devm_kcalloc(&auxdev->dev, num_resources, sizeof(*plr->die_info),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!plr->die_info) {
- err = -ENOMEM;
- goto err_notify;
- }
-
plr->num_dies = num_resources;
plr->dbgfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("plr", dentry);
plr->auxdev = auxdev;
@@ -361,7 +354,6 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const struct auxilia
err:
debugfs_remove_recursive(plr->dbgfs_dir);
-err_notify:
intel_plr_unregister_notifier(&plr->nb);
return err;
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCHv2] platform/x86/intel/tpmi/plr: allocate die_info with plr
2026-05-21 1:46 [PATCHv2] platform/x86/intel/tpmi/plr: allocate die_info with plr Rosen Penev
@ 2026-05-21 10:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ilpo Järvinen @ 2026-05-21 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rosen Penev
Cc: platform-driver-x86, Hans de Goede, Kees Cook,
Gustavo A. R. Silva, open list,
open list:KERNEL HARDENING (not covered by other areas):Keyword:b__counted_by(_le|_be|_ptr)?b
On Wed, 20 May 2026, Rosen Penev wrote:
> Simplifies allocations slightly.
>
> Add __counted_by for extra runtime analysis.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2: Rebase.
> drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c | 12 ++----------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
> index 8faecc311038..66220fadf670 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel/plr_tpmi.c
> @@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ struct tpmi_plr_die {
>
> struct tpmi_plr {
> struct dentry *dbgfs_dir;
> - struct tpmi_plr_die *die_info;
> int num_dies;
> struct auxiliary_device *auxdev;
> struct notifier_block nb;
> struct mutex lock; /* Protect access to dbgfs_dir */
> + struct tpmi_plr_die die_info[] __counted_by(num_dies);
> };
>
> static const char * const plr_coarse_reasons[] = {
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const struct auxilia
> if (!num_resources)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - plr = devm_kzalloc(&auxdev->dev, sizeof(*plr), GFP_KERNEL);
> + plr = devm_kzalloc(&auxdev->dev, struct_size(plr, die_info, num_resources), GFP_KERNEL);
Hi,
I'd prefer to have devm_kzalloc_flex() be added before continuing with
changes like this. Last time I mentioned it, you washed your hands about
adding it and moved the responsability to linux-hardening folks. (In case
you didn't know, devm_kzalloc_flex() could be added even by you!)
Alternatively, I might accept a good explanation why that cannot be done
or is not a good idea to have consistent interface for non-devm vs devm?
> if (!plr)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> @@ -315,13 +315,6 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const struct auxilia
>
> intel_plr_register_notifier(&plr->nb);
>
> - plr->die_info = devm_kcalloc(&auxdev->dev, num_resources, sizeof(*plr->die_info),
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!plr->die_info) {
> - err = -ENOMEM;
> - goto err_notify;
> - }
> -
> plr->num_dies = num_resources;
> plr->dbgfs_dir = debugfs_create_dir("plr", dentry);
> plr->auxdev = auxdev;
> @@ -361,7 +354,6 @@ static int intel_plr_probe(struct auxiliary_device *auxdev, const struct auxilia
>
> err:
> debugfs_remove_recursive(plr->dbgfs_dir);
> -err_notify:
> intel_plr_unregister_notifier(&plr->nb);
>
> return err;
>
--
i.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-05-21 10:33 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-05-21 1:46 [PATCHv2] platform/x86/intel/tpmi/plr: allocate die_info with plr Rosen Penev
2026-05-21 10:33 ` Ilpo Järvinen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox