From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 12/17] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 5 model checks with VFM ones
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 19:44:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250211194407.2577252-13-sohil.mehta@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250211194407.2577252-1-sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Introduce names for some Family 5 models and convert some of the checks
to be VFM based.
Also, to keep the file sorted by family, move Family 5 to the top of the
header file.
Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
---
v2: Reorder the Family 5 models to be at the top of the file.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h | 9 ++++++---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
index f509061b8c7e..9e6a13f03f0e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/intel-family.h
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@
/* Wildcard match so X86_MATCH_VFM(ANY) works */
#define INTEL_ANY IFM(X86_FAMILY_ANY, X86_MODEL_ANY)
+/* Family 5 */
+#define INTEL_FAM5_START IFM(5, 0x00) /* Notational marker, also P5 A-step */
+#define INTEL_PENTIUM_75 IFM(5, 0x02) /* P54C */
+#define INTEL_PENTIUM_MMX IFM(5, 0x04) /* P55C */
+#define INTEL_QUARK_X1000 IFM(5, 0x09) /* Quark X1000 SoC */
+
/* Family 6 */
#define INTEL_PENTIUM_PRO IFM(6, 0x01)
#define INTEL_PENTIUM_II_KLAMATH IFM(6, 0x03)
@@ -181,9 +187,6 @@
#define INTEL_XEON_PHI_KNL IFM(6, 0x57) /* Knights Landing */
#define INTEL_XEON_PHI_KNM IFM(6, 0x85) /* Knights Mill */
-/* Family 5 */
-#define INTEL_QUARK_X1000 IFM(5, 0x09) /* Quark X1000 SoC */
-
/* Family 15 - NetBurst */
#define INTEL_P4_WILLAMETTE IFM(15, 0x01) /* Also Xeon Foster */
#define INTEL_P4_PRESCOTT IFM(15, 0x03)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
index 507cb4c6d587..1b01ef4dfda2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
@@ -375,9 +375,8 @@ static void intel_smp_check(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
/*
* Mask B, Pentium, but not Pentium MMX
*/
- if (c->x86 == 5 &&
- c->x86_stepping >= 1 && c->x86_stepping <= 4 &&
- c->x86_model <= 3) {
+ if (c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_FAM5_START && c->x86_vfm < INTEL_PENTIUM_MMX &&
+ c->x86_stepping >= 1 && c->x86_stepping <= 4) {
/*
* Remember we have B step Pentia with bugs
*/
@@ -404,7 +403,7 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* The Quark is also family 5, but does not have the same bug.
*/
clear_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_F00F);
- if (c->x86 == 5 && c->x86_model < 9) {
+ if (c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_FAM5_START && c->x86_vfm < INTEL_QUARK_X1000) {
static int f00f_workaround_enabled;
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_F00F);
@@ -452,7 +451,7 @@ static void intel_workarounds(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
* integrated APIC (see 11AP erratum in "Pentium Processor
* Specification Update").
*/
- if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) && (c->x86<<8 | c->x86_model<<4) == 0x520 &&
+ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC) && c->x86_vfm == INTEL_PENTIUM_75 &&
(c->x86_stepping < 0x6 || c->x86_stepping == 0xb))
set_cpu_bug(c, X86_BUG_11AP);
@@ -627,7 +626,7 @@ static unsigned int intel_size_cache(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, unsigned int size)
* Intel Quark SoC X1000 contains a 4-way set associative
* 16K cache with a 16 byte cache line and 256 lines per tag
*/
- if ((c->x86 == 5) && (c->x86_model == 9))
+ if (c->x86_vfm == INTEL_QUARK_X1000)
size = 16;
return size;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-11 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-11 19:43 [PATCH v2 00/17] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] x86/smpboot: Remove confusing quirk usage in INIT delay Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] x86/smpboot: Fix INIT delay optimization for extended Intel Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:10 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 20:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] x86/apic: Fix 32-bit APIC initialization " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the movsl alignment preference for extended Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:26 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 21:45 ` David Laight
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] x86/cpu/intel: Fix page copy performance " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:53 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-12 0:54 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-02-12 21:19 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-13 23:02 ` Andrew Cooper
2025-02-14 0:29 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] cpufreq: Fix the efficient idle check for Intel " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-12 5:35 ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-13 18:49 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-14 2:03 ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] hwmon: Fix Intel Family-model checks to include " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 20:58 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 21:38 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-12 13:43 ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-12 16:57 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-14 2:23 ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-12 13:10 ` Zhang, Rui
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 08/17] x86/microcode: Update the Intel processor flag scan check Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:00 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:43 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] x86/mtrr: Modify a x86_model check to an Intel VFM check Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:00 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] x86/cpu/intel: Replace early Family 6 checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:03 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 15 " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:03 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-02-11 21:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 5 model " Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] x86/pat: Replace Intel x86_model " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:09 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 21:42 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] x86/acpi/cstate: Improve Intel Family model checks Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:20 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] x86/cpu/intel: Bound the non-architectural constant_tsc " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 21:41 ` Dave Hansen
2025-02-12 0:45 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] perf/x86: Simplify P6 PMU initialization Sohil Mehta
2025-02-11 19:44 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] perf/x86/p4: Replace Pentium 4 model checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250211194407.2577252-13-sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox