Linux Hardware Monitor development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay"
	<devnull+abdurrahman.nexthop.ai@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) use wall-clock seconds for SET_RTC
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 23:48:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508234854.A7BE4C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508-adm1266-v1-1-ec08bf29e0ce@nexthop.ai>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Silent truncation of a 64-bit real-time timestamp causes Y2038 arithmetic overflow.
- [High] Unconditionally overwriting the hardware RTC during probe destroys retained state and defeats cross-reboot correlation.
--

commit 260e18847f33c3f0022668e0092b4f93049b2ea6
Author: Abdurrahman Hussain <abdurrahman@nexthop.ai>

hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) use wall-clock seconds for SET_RTC

This patch modifies the ADM1266 driver to seed the device internal RTC
with wall-clock time instead of monotonic time since boot. This change is
intended to allow cross-reboot correlation of blackbox records.

> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c
> index d90f8f80be8e0..a86666c73a5e9 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/adm1266.c
> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int adm1266_set_rtc(struct adm1266_data *data)
>  	char write_buf[6];
>  	int i;
>  
> -	kt = ktime_get_seconds();
> +	kt = ktime_get_real_seconds();

Can this lead to an arithmetic overflow? ktime_get_real_seconds returns
a 64-bit time64_t, but the subsequent serialization loop only processes
4 bytes:

    for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
        write_buf[2 + i] = (kt >> (i * 8)) & 0xFF;

This silently truncates the upper 32 bits of the timestamp. Should the value
be clamped or bounds-checked to prevent silent wrap-around?

Also, if adm1266_set_rtc is called unconditionally during early probe, will
ktime_get_real_seconds return an uninitialized time near the 1970 epoch
if the system wall-clock has not yet been synchronized via an external RTC
or userspace NTP?

Overwriting the internal hardware RTC on every probe could destroy any valid
time state retained across a warm reboot, breaking the stated goal of
cross-reboot log correlation. Does this code need to preserve the existing
RTC state rather than seeding it at probe?

>  
>  	memset(write_buf, 0, sizeof(write_buf));
>

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508-adm1266-v1-0-ec08bf29e0ce@nexthop.ai?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08 23:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08 23:33 [PATCH 0/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) RTC fix, blackbox, FW rev, rtc_class Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 23:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) use wall-clock seconds for SET_RTC Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-08 23:48   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-08 23:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) write fractional-seconds field of SET_RTC Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-09  0:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 23:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add firmware_revision debugfs entry Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-09  0:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 23:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add clear_blackbox " Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-09  1:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 23:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) add powerup_counter " Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-09  1:48   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 23:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) register rtc_class device backed by SET_RTC Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-09  2:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-08 23:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) include adapter number in GPIO line label Abdurrahman Hussain via B4 Relay
2026-05-09  2:39   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-09 14:14 ` [PATCH 0/7] hwmon: (pmbus/adm1266) RTC fix, blackbox, FW rev, rtc_class Guenter Roeck
2026-05-09 21:58   ` Abdurrahman Hussain
2026-05-09 23:49     ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-11  3:46       ` Abdurrahman Hussain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260508234854.A7BE4C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=devnull+abdurrahman.nexthop.ai@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox