From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/9] platform/x86: dell-privacy: Use new buffer-based WMI API
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:45:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610204518.33F021F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610203453.816254-3-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] dell_privacy_has_mic_mute() accesses `priv->features_present` after releasing `list_mutex`, risking a Use-After-Free if the device is concurrently unbound.
--
commit c9150394b4cc5e06aab976ccc95fd348e2c66514
Author: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
platform/x86: dell-privacy: Use new buffer-based WMI API
Use the new buffer-based WMI API to also support ACPI firmware
implementations that do not use ACPI buffers for the device state.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-privacy.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-privacy.c
> index ed099a431ea4d..f9d275b2f900c 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-privacy.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-wmi-privacy.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -185,60 +208,28 @@ static struct attribute *privacy_attrs[] = {
> };
> ATTRIBUTE_GROUPS(privacy);
>
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing the file
I noticed a potential use-after-free in dell_privacy_has_mic_mute().
dell_privacy_has_mic_mute() accesses priv->features_present after
releasing list_mutex:
bool dell_privacy_has_mic_mute(void)
{
struct privacy_wmi_data *priv;
mutex_lock(&list_mutex);
priv = list_first_entry_or_null(&wmi_list,
struct privacy_wmi_data,
list);
mutex_unlock(&list_mutex);
return priv && (priv->features_present & BIT(DELL_PRIVACY_TYPE_AUDIO));
}
If dell_privacy_wmi_remove() executes concurrently (e.g., via sysfs unbind)
and removes priv from the list, the devres core will automatically free the
devm_kzalloc-backed priv structure.
If the thread running dell_privacy_has_mic_mute() is preempted immediately
after unlocking list_mutex, will the subsequent dereference of
priv->features_present read freed memory?
> -/*
> - * Describes the Device State class exposed by BIOS which can be consumed by
> - * various applications interested in knowing the Privacy feature capabilities.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610203453.816254-1-W_Armin@gmx.de?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 20:34 [PATCH v6 0/9] Convert most Dell WMI drivers to use the new buffer-based API Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] platform/x86: dell-descriptor: Use new buffer-based WMI API Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] platform/x86: dell-privacy: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] platform/x86: dell-wmi-base: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] platform/x86: dell-ddv: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] hwmon: (dell-smm) " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 21:29 ` Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] platform/wmi: Make wmi_bus_class const Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] platform/wmi: Make sysfs attributes const Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] modpost: Handle malformed WMI GUID strings Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 21:05 ` Pali Rohár
2026-06-10 21:31 ` Armin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610204518.33F021F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox