From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Armin Wolf" <W_Armin@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/9] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: Use new buffer-based WMI API
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:47:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610204721.CFF751F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260610203453.816254-4-W_Armin@gmx.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] If the ACPI WMI method successfully evaluates but returns no output object, `wmidev_invoke_method()` returns success and sets the output data to `ZERO_SIZE_PTR`, bypassing the `min_size` constraint. `run_smbios_call()` then unconditionally executes `memcpy` from `ZERO_SIZE_PTR`, leading to a kernel panic.
- [High] Use-After-Free (UAF) in the ioctl and read paths because the character device is unregistered using a devm action, allowing file operations to execute after the underlying device memory is freed.
--
commit ab9678fa1e5f61b73fc8e1705045d35055367552
Author: Armin Wolf <W_Armin@gmx.de>
platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: Use new buffer-based WMI API
This commit updates the dell-smbios-wmi driver to use the new buffer-based WMI
API. It transitions the driver to support ACPI firmware implementations that do
not rely on ACPI buffers for SMBIOS call results.
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> index a7dca8c59d602..64d0871b706e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/dell/dell-smbios-wmi.c
> @@ -50,38 +50,32 @@ static inline struct wmi_smbios_priv *get_first_smbios_priv(void)
>
> static int run_smbios_call(struct wmi_device *wdev)
> {
[ ... ]
> - status = wmidev_evaluate_method(wdev, 0, 1, &input, &output);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> - return -EIO;
> - obj = (union acpi_object *)output.pointer;
> - if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> - dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "received type: %d\n", obj->type);
> - if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
> - dev_dbg(&wdev->dev, "SMBIOS call failed: %llu\n",
> - obj->integer.value);
> - kfree(output.pointer);
> - return -EIO;
> - }
> - memcpy(input.pointer, obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
> + /*
> + * The output buffer returned by the WMI method should have at least the size
> + * of the input buffer.
> + */
> + ret = wmidev_invoke_method(wdev, 0, 1, &input, &output, input.length);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + memcpy(input.data, output.data, input.length);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this memcpy() cause a kernel panic
if the WMI method successfully evaluates but returns no output object?
If wmidev_invoke_method() in drivers/platform/wmi/core.c encounters a
missing ACPI object (!obj), it returns 0 and sets out->data to ZERO_SIZE_PTR:
status = wmidev_evaluate_method(wdev, instance, method_id, &ain, &aout);
...
obj = aout.pointer;
if (!obj) {
out->length = 0;
out->data = ZERO_SIZE_PTR;
return 0;
}
Since wmidev_invoke_method() returns success and bypasses the min_size check,
the memcpy() here would attempt to read input.length bytes from ZERO_SIZE_PTR,
leading to an invalid memory access.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does the character device unregistration
sequence allow for a use-after-free during device unbind?
The driver registers a character device via misc_register() and uses
devm_add_action_or_reset() to unregister it. It also allocates the priv
and priv->buf structures using devm_kzalloc() and devm_get_free_pages().
When the WMI device is removed (e.g., via sysfs unbind), the devm cleanup
actions call misc_deregister() and then free the priv memory. However,
misc_deregister() does not revoke existing open file descriptors.
If a userspace process holds the character device open while the device
is unbound, it can subsequently call ioctl() or read(). These operations
would dereference filp->private_data in dell_smbios_wmi_ioctl() (which
points to the freed priv struct) and access the freed priv->buf memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260610203453.816254-1-W_Armin@gmx.de?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-10 20:34 [PATCH v6 0/9] Convert most Dell WMI drivers to use the new buffer-based API Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] platform/x86: dell-descriptor: Use new buffer-based WMI API Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] platform/x86: dell-privacy: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] platform/x86: dell-smbios-wmi: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] platform/x86: dell-wmi-base: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] platform/x86: dell-ddv: " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] hwmon: (dell-smm) " Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 21:29 ` Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] platform/wmi: Make wmi_bus_class const Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] platform/wmi: Make sysfs attributes const Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 20:34 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] modpost: Handle malformed WMI GUID strings Armin Wolf
2026-06-10 20:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 21:05 ` Pali Rohár
2026-06-10 21:31 ` Armin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610204721.CFF751F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=W_Armin@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox