From: Ali Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com>
To: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (corsair-psu) serialize debugfs access against hwmon
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 10:06:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260804100645.233305-1-ali@iusegentoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260804094753.230500-1-ali@iusegentoo.com>
> the next command's reinit_completion() re-arms the guard at the top of
> raw_event, and that stale reply is taken as the answer to the new command
Correcting myself on the mechanism, since it changes what a fix has to do.
reinit_completion() is not what defeats that guard. completion_done() is
just x->done != 0, and x->done is zero in every state between commands: a
successful wait_for_completion_timeout() decrements it back to zero, and a
timeout leaves it at zero because it was never set. So the check at the top
of raw_event practically never rejects anything, and reinit_completion() on
the next command writes zero over a value that is already zero.
The outcome I described is the same, a late reply still lands in cmd_buffer
and completes the next waiter with the previous command's data. But that
check is not a "command in flight" flag and cannot be turned into one by
moving it around, so whatever fixes this needs a way to tell which command a
reply actually belongs to.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-04 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 12:36 [PATCH] hwmon: (corsair-psu) serialize debugfs access against hwmon Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-02 12:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:57 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-02 14:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-03 23:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-03 23:56 ` Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-04 2:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-04 4:11 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-04 9:47 ` Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-04 10:06 ` Ali Ahmet Memis [this message]
2026-08-04 16:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-04 17:53 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-04 18:37 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-04 20:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-06 5:23 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-06 9:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-06 12:19 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-06 14:10 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-06 14:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 14:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 15:41 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260804100645.233305-1-ali@iusegentoo.com \
--to=ali@iusegentoo.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox