From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ali Ahmet Memis" <ali@iusegentoo.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (corsair-psu) serialize debugfs access against hwmon
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 14:35:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806143506.B81821F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806142139.168611-1-ali@iusegentoo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Potential data race and buffer corruption on the shared `cmd_buffer` following a command timeout.
- [High] Out-of-bounds read and potential information leak in debugfs handlers for vendor and product strings.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] hwmon: (corsair-psu) serialize debugfs access against hwmon ---
commit 17027f95f57d41549658af1b49c4295c03ed4860
Author: Ali Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com>
hwmon: (corsair-psu) serialize debugfs access against hwmon
This commit adds guard(hwmon_lock) to the debugfs read paths in
print_uptime() and ocpmode_show() to serialize them against the hwmon core.
This prevents data races and incorrect sensor readings resulting from
concurrent USB commands interleaving.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/5f0406fa-9692-49f0-bcfe-c013f5fc7b62@roeck-us.net/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260806161028.42218ebd@posteo.net/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260802123653.19532-1-ali@iusegentoo.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
> index ce958cdaef58a..033166db6bc42 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c
> @@ -664,6 +664,8 @@ static void print_uptime(struct seq_file *seqf, u8 cmd)
> long val;
> int ret;
>
> + guard(hwmon_lock)(priv->hwmon_dev);
> +
> ret = corsairpsu_get_value(priv, cmd, 0, &val);
[ ... ]
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this sequence lead to a data race or
buffer corruption on the shared cmd_buffer if a USB command times out?
If wait_for_completion_timeout() times out in corsairpsu_usb_cmd(), the
completion is left uncompleted. If the hardware later sends a delayed
response, the asynchronous HID interrupt in corsairpsu_raw_event() will
blindly copy the data:
drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c:corsairpsu_raw_event() {
...
memcpy(priv->cmd_buffer, data, min(CMD_BUFFER_SIZE, size));
complete(&priv->wait_completion);
...
}
If a new request is concurrently executing in corsairpsu_usb_cmd(), this
delayed copy will race with its setup:
drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c:corsairpsu_usb_cmd() {
...
memset(priv->cmd_buffer, 0, CMD_BUFFER_SIZE);
...
}
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code potentially cause an
out-of-bounds read and information leak in the debugfs handlers?
When corsairpsu_fwinfo() fetches the vendor and product information, it
copies exactly REPLY_SIZE (24) bytes from the untrusted USB device into
priv->vendor and priv->product:
drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c:corsairpsu_usb_cmd() {
...
memcpy(data, priv->cmd_buffer + 2, REPLY_SIZE);
...
}
If a malicious device provides exactly 24 non-null characters, these strings
will not be null-terminated. When seq_printf() prints them in vendor_show()
and product_show(), it could read past the array bounds and leak adjacent
kernel heap memory:
drivers/hwmon/corsair-psu.c:vendor_show() {
...
seq_printf(seqf, "%s\n", priv->vendor);
...
}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806142139.168611-1-ali@iusegentoo.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 14:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-02 12:36 [PATCH] hwmon: (corsair-psu) serialize debugfs access against hwmon Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-02 12:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-02 12:57 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-02 14:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-03 23:19 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-03 23:56 ` Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-04 2:54 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-04 4:11 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-04 9:47 ` Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-04 10:06 ` Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-04 16:34 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-04 17:53 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-04 18:37 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-04 20:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-06 5:23 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-06 9:23 ` Guenter Roeck
2026-08-06 12:19 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-06 14:10 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2026-08-06 14:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 14:35 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 15:41 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806143506.B81821F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ali@iusegentoo.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox