From: Marius Zachmann <mail@mariuszachmann.de>
To: Wilken Gottwalt <wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net>
Cc: Aleksandr Mezin <mezin.alexander@gmail.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: corsair-cpro and hidraw
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2021 09:06:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27527118.vr9HtJ8RzA@marius> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210618084737.200f8575@monster.powergraphx.local>
On 18.06.21 at 08:47:37 CEST, Wilken Gottwalt wrote
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 08:18:23 +0200
> Marius Zachmann <mail@mariuszachmann.de> wrote:
>
> > On 18.06.21 at 07:45:00 CEST, Wilken Gottwalt wrote
> > > On Fri, 18 Jun 2021 05:56:29 +0600
> > > Aleksandr Mezin <mezin.alexander@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I've looked through corsair-psu sources, and I think filtering in
> > > > raw_event won't be enough.
> > > >
> > > > For example, in corsairpsu_request, there are 2 commands, and they
> > > > should be executed consecutively:
> > > > 1) corsairpsu_usb_cmd(priv, 2, PSU_CMD_SELECT_RAIL, rail, NULL);
> > > > 2) corsairpsu_usb_cmd(priv, 3, cmd, 0, data);
> > > >
> > > > If the userspace will squeeze another PSU_CMD_SELECT_RAIL between (1)
> > > > and (2), the driver will get data for a wrong rail (and with the
> > > > current code won't even notice it).
> > > >
> > > > So unless there is a way to "lock" hidraw (and it seems that there
> > > > isn't - looking at the code, hidraw calls the low-level hid driver
> > > > directly, as far as I understand), it won't work correctly.
> > > >
> > > > And if a driver can't work correctly with hidraw enabled - maybe it
> > > > shouldn't enable hidraw? So that the user can 1) notice that something
> > > > is wrong 2) blacklist or unbind the driver (or userspace tools that
> > > > use hidraw can unbind automatically). Otherwise everything seems to be
> > > > silently broken.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, maybe races between the kernel driver and userspace
> > > > tools are unlikely, because the driver doesn't talk to the device
> > > > continuously - only when sysfs reads happen.
> > >
> > > I never noticed any issues of that kind. I actually did quite a lot of
> > > userspace testing. A result of this a userspace tool you can find here:
> > > https://github.com/wgottwalt/corsair-psu/tree/main/tools/rmi-hxi-query
> > >
> > > Though, if you find a way to trigger such a race condition I have no
> > > problem to remove the hidraw part.
> > >
> > > greetings
> > > Will
> >
> > It is possible. Making a userspace tool with just a loop of read/writes
> > will get you wrong readings in the driver sometimes.
>
> Hmm, did you read the comments in the driver? I warn about writing nonsense
> values to the micro-controller because you can make it stall. If I let you
> access the device by hidraw I assume you know what you are doing. You
> actually can damage your PSU by this, something I also warn about. I even
> mention that I may remove the hidraw feature in future versions.
Sorry for the confusion. I did not test with corsair-psu. (Do not have
the hardware) I tested with corsair-cpro. Reading temps with userspace and
reading fan speed with the driver simultaneously.
But you are right. This is also not, what a userspace tool should do this
fast and if it doesn't, races are really unlikely.
>
> > Removing hidraw from the drivers is not a solution, because there are
> > many userspace tools for these devices and it should be an expected use case
> > to have them running at the same time (eg OpenRGB for rgb)
>
> corsair-psu is a hwmon driver, not a gadget driver. This driver does not
> have to provide hidraw, only hwmon api access. The hidraw is just a nice
> to have feature. And like my query tool shows, you actually don't need the
> driver to query it from userspace. The first prototypes of the driver did
> locking in the hidraw part which sometimes resulted in lockups. I will
> not increase complexity for a nice-to-have feature. So the only option is,
> I remove the feature if it causes trouble.
>
> Guenter, what do you think?
>
> greetings,
> Will
>
> > I think the correct solution would be to lock hidraw while the
> > drivers are doing requests.
> > After a (short) look:
> > Introducing a mutex in the hidraw struct which would be locked in
> > hidraw_ioctl and could also be locked in the corsair-psu and
> > corsair-cpro drivers could be a solution.
> > If there are no objections or better suggestions, I will try this
> > over the weekend.
> >
> > Greetings
> > Marius
> >
> > Added Jiri Kosina for hidraw to Cc:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > > Added corsair-psu maintainer to Cc:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 7:14 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 01:11:38PM +0600, Aleksandr Mezin wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 12:27 PM Marius Zachmann <mail@mariuszachmann.de> wrote:
> > > > > > ...
> > > > > > > This device uses an echo of the command
> > > > > > > in the answer and if they don't match it returns an error. This could
> > > > > > > maybe lead to a false error when the replies are switched, but is
> > > > > > > probably preferable.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hm... If the response includes the id of the request, it should be
> > > > > > possible to filter reports in raw_event, i. e. don't signal completion
> > > > > > if the report doesn't match, and wait more. Yes, there is a corner
> > > > > > case, "if a command is not supported, the length value in the reply is
> > > > > > okay, but the command value is set to 0". But timing out (250 ms) in
> > > > > > this case should probably be fine... Actually I have a compatible
> > > > > > Corsair PSU so maybe I'll send a patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > Patches to improve the situation are welcome. My understanding is
> > > > > that with the current driver users should disable the kernel driver
> > > > > if they plan to use userspace tools to access the device.
> > > > >
> > > > > Guenter
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-18 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-17 3:11 corsair-cpro and hidraw Aleksandr Mezin
2021-06-17 4:33 ` Aleksandr Mezin
2021-06-17 6:27 ` Marius Zachmann
2021-06-17 7:11 ` Aleksandr Mezin
2021-06-17 13:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-17 23:56 ` Aleksandr Mezin
2021-06-18 5:45 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2021-06-18 6:18 ` Marius Zachmann
2021-06-18 6:47 ` Wilken Gottwalt
2021-06-18 7:06 ` Marius Zachmann [this message]
2021-06-18 12:13 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-18 12:22 ` Marius Zachmann
2021-06-18 19:41 ` Guenter Roeck
2021-06-18 12:10 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27527118.vr9HtJ8RzA@marius \
--to=mail@mariuszachmann.de \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=mezin.alexander@gmail.com \
--cc=wilken.gottwalt@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox