From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Long Li" <longli@microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v10 5/6] net: mana: Allocate interrupt context for each EQ when creating vPort
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 04:05:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260516040533.C84C0C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515040508.491748-6-longli@microsoft.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The RDMA driver (mana_ib) fails to initialize because it does not allocate GIC references for its EQs.
--
commit 9f615e81497dbea890c8df0a9aa9efd643e9a6a7
Author: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
net: mana: Allocate interrupt context for each EQ when creating vPort
This commit updates the driver to use GIC functions to create a dedicated
interrupt context or acquire a shared interrupt context for each EQ when
setting up a vPort. The caller is now responsible for acquiring and
releasing the GIC reference across the EQ create/destroy lifecycle.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microsoft/mana/mana_en.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1684,12 +1690,22 @@ int mana_create_eq(struct mana_port_context *apc)
> debugfs_create_dir("EQs", apc->mana_port_debugfs);
>
> for (i = 0; i < apc->num_queues; i++) {
> - spec.eq.msix_index = (i + 1) % gc->num_msix_usable;
> + msi = (i + 1) % gc->num_msix_usable;
> +
> + gic = mana_gd_get_gic(gc, !gc->msi_sharing, &msi);
> + if (!gic) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> + spec.eq.msix_index = msi;
Will this change to the initialization logic break the RDMA driver (mana_ib)?
Since the caller is now required to manually acquire a GIC reference via
mana_gd_get_gic() before creating EQs, and mana_ib hasn't been updated to
do this, won't it trigger a WARN_ON(!gic) inside mana_gd_register_irq() and
fail device initialization?
I noticed this was fixed later in the patch series by commit 'RDMA/mana_ib:
Allocate interrupt contexts on EQs', but could this break bisectability here?
> +
> err = mana_gd_create_mana_eq(gd, &spec, &apc->eqs[i].eq);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260515040508.491748-1-longli@microsoft.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-16 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-15 4:05 [PATCH net-next v10 0/6] net: mana: Per-vPort EQ and MSI-X interrupt management Long Li
2026-05-15 4:05 ` [PATCH net-next v10 1/6] net: mana: Create separate EQs for each vPort Long Li
2026-05-16 4:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 4:05 ` [PATCH net-next v10 2/6] net: mana: Query device capabilities and configure MSI-X sharing for EQs Long Li
2026-05-16 4:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-15 4:05 ` [PATCH net-next v10 3/6] net: mana: Introduce GIC context with refcounting for interrupt management Long Li
2026-05-15 4:05 ` [PATCH net-next v10 4/6] net: mana: Use GIC functions to allocate global EQs Long Li
2026-05-15 4:05 ` [PATCH net-next v10 5/6] net: mana: Allocate interrupt context for each EQ when creating vPort Long Li
2026-05-16 4:05 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-15 4:05 ` [PATCH net-next v10 6/6] RDMA/mana_ib: Allocate interrupt contexts on EQs Long Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260516040533.C84C0C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox