From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Berkant Koc" <me@berkoc.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count from host VMBus message
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 13:49:25 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260517134926.B4179C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260517-drm-hyperv-patch1@berkoc.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Uninitialized State on Error Path Leaves Display Unusable
- [High] Missing Completion Re-Initialization Breaks Driver Synchronization
--
commit 94c5684ae582179bbf9c456d94f6a0bd0f92785f
Author: Berkant Koc <me@berkoc.com>
Subject: drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count from host VMBus message
This patch adds validation to ensure the host-provided resolution_count does
not exceed SYNTHVID_MAX_RESOLUTION_COUNT. It folds this check into the
existing zero-count check to prevent reading past the end of the supported
resolution array.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c
> index 051ecc5268321..003bb118d64c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c
> @@ -391,8 +391,11 @@ static int hyperv_get_supported_resolution(struct hv_device *hdev)
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> }
This isn't a bug in your patch, but looking at the wait_for_completion_timeout
call just before this hunk, does the driver reuse the hv->wait completion
structure for multiple sequential VMBus requests without calling
reinit_completion()?
If a previous request times out but the host sends a delayed response, the
receive callback might execute complete(&hv->wait). Could a subsequent
request's wait_for_completion_timeout incorrectly consume this stray
completion, return immediately, and parse stale data from hv->init_buf?
>
> - if (msg->resolution_resp.resolution_count == 0) {
> - drm_err(dev, "No supported resolutions\n");
> + if (msg->resolution_resp.resolution_count == 0 ||
> + msg->resolution_resp.resolution_count >
> + SYNTHVID_MAX_RESOLUTION_COUNT) {
> + drm_err(dev, "Invalid resolution count: %d\n",
> + msg->resolution_resp.resolution_count);
> return -ENODEV;
This is also a pre-existing issue, but I noticed that returning an error
here can leave the display unusable.
When hyperv_get_supported_resolution() fails due to this new bounds check,
the caller hyperv_connect_vsp() logs a warning to use defaults, but it
skips setting up the resolution limits. As a result, hv->screen_width_max
and hv->screen_height_max remain 0.
Later, hyperv_mode_config_init() sets dev->mode_config.max_width and
max_height to 0. Since the DRM core's drm_internal_framebuffer_create()
strictly bounds framebuffer dimensions to dev->mode_config.max_width,
would this cause all userspace attempts to create a framebuffer to fail
with -EINVAL?
> }
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260517-drm-hyperv-cover@berkoc.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-17 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-17 12:55 [PATCH 0/2] drm/hyperv: harden VMBus message parser input validation Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count from host VMBus message Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 13:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-17 12:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/hyperv: validate VMBus packet size in receive callback Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/hyperv: harden VMBus message parser input validation Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count and harden VSP request paths Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 18:33 ` Michael Kelley
2026-05-19 20:20 ` Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/hyperv: validate VMBus packet size in receive callback Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 18:33 ` Michael Kelley
2026-05-19 20:20 ` Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 20:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/hyperv: harden host message parsing Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 20:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count and fix WIN8 fallback Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 20:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 20:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/hyperv: validate VMBus packet size in receive callback Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 21:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 13:23 ` Berkant Koc
2026-05-20 14:24 ` Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260517134926.B4179C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@berkoc.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox