From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Berkant Koc" <me@berkoc.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count and harden VSP request paths
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 14:47:44 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260517144744.BCAFBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260517-drm-hyperv-patch1-v2@berkoc.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] The fix for delayed VSP responses is incomplete, leaving a critical data race on the shared `hv->init_buf` that allows type confusion and out-of-bounds memory reads.
--
commit 3d049f39a946f7898e25e92a422ae95b066e9989
Author: Berkant Koc <me@berkoc.com>
drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count and harden VSP request paths
This commit adds bounds checking for resolution_count when parsing
SYNTHVID_RESOLUTION_RESPONSE. It degrades gracefully to default
resolutions on failure, and adds reinit_completion() before VSP requests
to prevent consuming stale completions.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/hyperv/hyperv_drm_proto.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -383,6 +385,7 @@ static int hyperv_get_supported_resolution(struct hv_device *hdev)
> sizeof(struct synthvid_supported_resolution_req);
> msg->resolution_req.maximum_resolution_count =
> SYNTHVID_MAX_RESOLUTION_COUNT;
> + reinit_completion(&hv->wait);
> hyperv_sendpacket(hdev, msg);
Does this reinit_completion() prevent a data race on the shared hv->init_buf?
If a timed-out request's delayed response arrives while a new request is
being constructed, could hyperv_receive_sub() concurrently overwrite
hv->init_buf without holding any locks?
Since the buffer is used for both sending and receiving, if a delayed
response arrives exactly between the memset(msg, 0) and
hyperv_sendpacket(hdev, msg), could msg->vid_hdr.size be overwritten by
the host's response?
If a host provides a crafted size, could this cause an integer overflow in
totalbytes_towrite within hv_ringbuffer_write(), bypassing ring buffer
free-space checks and causing an out-of-bounds read of guest memory into
the VMBus ring buffer?
Additionally, if the delayed response triggers complete(&hv->wait), is
there a chance the driver parses a mismatched response because it does not
validate that msg->vid_hdr.type matches the expected response?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260517-drm-hyperv-cover-v2@berkoc.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-17 14:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-17 12:55 [PATCH 0/2] drm/hyperv: harden VMBus message parser input validation Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 12:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count from host VMBus message Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 13:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 12:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/hyperv: validate VMBus packet size in receive callback Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-17 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] drm/hyperv: harden VMBus message parser input validation Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count and harden VSP request paths Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-19 18:33 ` Michael Kelley
2026-05-19 20:20 ` Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 14:25 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/hyperv: validate VMBus packet size in receive callback Berkant Koc
2026-05-17 15:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 18:33 ` Michael Kelley
2026-05-19 20:20 ` Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 20:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] drm/hyperv: harden host message parsing Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 20:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] drm/hyperv: validate resolution_count and fix WIN8 fallback Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 20:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 20:08 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] drm/hyperv: validate VMBus packet size in receive callback Berkant Koc
2026-05-19 21:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 13:23 ` Berkant Koc
2026-05-20 14:24 ` Michael Kelley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260517144744.BCAFBC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@berkoc.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox