From: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
"Haiyang Zhang" <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
"Wei Liu" <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
"Dexuan Cui" <decui@microsoft.com>,
"Long Li" <longli@microsoft.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Joerg Roedel (AMD)" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"Suravee Suthikulpanit" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"Vasant Hegde" <vasant.hegde@amd.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Jake Oshins <jakeo@microsoft.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 13:51:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728135117.2888175-3-namjain@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728135117.2888175-1-namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
fixup_irqs() re-injects a pending interrupt on its new target CPU by
looking at the outermost domain chip and invoking its irq_retrigger()
callback directly. That only works when the outermost chip happens to
install an irq_retrigger() callback, which is not guaranteed for every
irqchip and could lead to lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug.
Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() instead, which walks up the interrupt
hierarchy until it finds a chip that implements irq_retrigger().
While at it, move the loop-local variables into the loop scope and use a
scoped guard for desc->lock.
No functional change intended for chips which already provide an
irq_retrigger() callback on the outermost domain.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 23 +++++++----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 30122f0b3af96..ef1bdd3c4659a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -466,11 +466,6 @@ DEFINE_IDTENTRY_SYSVEC(sysvec_posted_msi_notification)
/* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
void fixup_irqs(void)
{
- unsigned int vector;
- struct irq_desc *desc;
- struct irq_data *data;
- struct irq_chip *chip;
-
irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu();
/*
@@ -489,22 +484,18 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
* vector_lock because the cpu is already marked !online, so
* nothing else will touch it.
*/
- for (vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
- if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector])))
+ for (unsigned int vector = FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR; vector < NR_VECTORS; vector++) {
+ struct irq_desc *desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
+
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(desc))
continue;
if (is_vector_pending(vector)) {
- desc = __this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]);
-
- raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
- data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
- chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
- if (chip->irq_retrigger) {
- chip->irq_retrigger(data);
+ guard(raw_spinlock)(&desc->lock);
+ if (irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy(&desc->irq_data))
__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_RETRIGGERED);
- }
- raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
}
+
if (__this_cpu_read(vector_irq[vector]) != VECTOR_RETRIGGERED)
__this_cpu_write(vector_irq[vector], VECTOR_UNUSED);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 13:51 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: Fix lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug for Hyper-V PCI/MSI Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip Naman Jain
2026-07-28 14:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 13:51 ` Naman Jain [this message]
2026-07-28 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs() sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq, iommu/amd, PCI: Drop redundant irq_retrigger inits Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728135117.2888175-3-namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jakeo@microsoft.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longli@microsoft.com \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vasant.hegde@amd.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox