From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Naman Jain" <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 14:04:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728140427.714311F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728135117.2888175-2-namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The fix for dropped pending interrupts during CPU hot-unplug was missed in the sister Hyper-V root partition MSI domain.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip ---
commit b8b1c843c457dd145f0d360b44f4b1bf34bd8cf5
Author: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip
The Hyper-V vPCI MSI irqchip never installs an irq_retrigger() callback.
On CPU hot-unplug fixup_irqs() migrates the interrupts which are affine to
the outgoing CPU to a new target. As the Hyper-V PCI/MSI chip does not
provide that callback, the pending interrupt is silently dropped, which
can result in lost interrupts, stalls and "No irq handler for vector"
messages.
Fixes: 4daace0d8ce85 ("PCI: hv: Add paravirtual PCI front-end for Microsoft Hyper-V VMs")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Long Li <longli@microsoft.com>
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Naman Jain <namjain@linux.microsoft.com>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index cfc8fa403dad6..89816a2bd7cd3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -2119,6 +2119,7 @@ static bool hv_pcie_init_dev_msi_info(struct device *dev, struct irq_domain *dom
> info->ops->msi_prepare = hv_msi_prepare;
>
> chip->irq_set_affinity = irq_chip_set_affinity_parent;
> + chip->irq_retrigger = irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the sister Hyper-V root
partition MSI domain in arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c also need this fix?
Looking at hv_init_dev_msi_info(), it appears to be missing the exact same
callback initialization for the root partition's top-level irq_chip:
arch/x86/hyperv/irqdomain.c:hv_init_dev_msi_info() {
...
if (!msi_lib_init_dev_msi_info(dev, domain, real_parent, info))
return false;
chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE | IRQCHIP_MOVE_DEFERRED;
info->ops->msi_prepare = pci_msi_prepare;
return true;
}
If a CPU is hot-unplugged while a device MSI interrupt is pending in its
local APIC IRR, could fixup_irqs() fail to resend the pending interrupt
to the new target CPU because this callback is NULL?
This could potentially lead to the same lost interrupts and I/O stalls
described in this commit message, just in the root partition MSI domain
instead of the guest paravirtual MSI domain.
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86))
> chip->flags |= IRQCHIP_MOVE_DEFERRED;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728135117.2888175-1-namjain@linux.microsoft.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 13:51 [PATCH 0/3] x86/irq: Fix lost interrupts on CPU hot-unplug for Hyper-V PCI/MSI Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] PCI: hv: Set irq_retrigger callback for the Hyper-V PCI MSI irqchip Naman Jain
2026-07-28 14:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/irq: Use irq_chip_retrigger_hierarchy() in fixup_irqs() Naman Jain
2026-07-28 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 13:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/irq, iommu/amd, PCI: Drop redundant irq_retrigger inits Naman Jain
2026-07-28 13:59 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728140427.714311F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namjain@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox