From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wei Hu" <weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 06/13] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:04:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807150427.4E2201F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807135134.303943-7-weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Failing to query optional SEV-SNP support aborts the entire `mshv` module initialization, preventing non-SNP virtual machines from running on unsupported platforms.
- [Low] The helper function `hv_snp_status_to_string` is defined unconditionally but only used inside an x86-specific block, causing a build failure on non-x86 architectures.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v1 06/13] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init ---
commit e3193a7357d34307ce8275f28a3eb193fd3183cf
Author: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init
Query Hyper-V dynamic processor features during mshv initialization to
determine SEV-SNP availability, and report the result.
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> index 3590a8ea24b5f..cc38507570ac4 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> @@ -2660,6 +2660,109 @@ static int mshv_root_scheduler_cleanup(unsigned int cpu)
> }
>
> /* Must be called after retrieving the scheduler type */
> +#if defined(__x86_64__)
> +static int mshv_print_max_sev_snp_partitions(struct device *dev)
> +{
[ ... ]
> + status = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_GET_SYSTEM_PROPERTY, input, output);
> + if (!hv_result_success(status)) {
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get max SNP partitions: %s\n",
> + hv_result_to_string(status));
> + return hv_result_to_errno(status);
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does propagating this error cause driver initialization to abort on platforms
that do not support SEV-SNP?
If the hypervisor does not support this dynamic processor feature, returning
an error here will cause the entire mshv module to fail to load because it
is propagated up to mshv_parent_partition_init().
[ ... ]
> +static const char *hv_snp_status_to_string(enum hv_snp_status status)
> +{
> + switch (status) {
> + case HV_SNP_STATUS_NONE:
> + return "not available";
[Severity: Low]
This function is defined unconditionally, but it is only called from within
an `#if defined(__x86_64__)` block in mshv_check_sev_snp_support().
Does this cause an unused function warning on non-x86 architectures (such as
ARM64) that could break the build when CONFIG_WERROR is enabled?
[ ... ]
> +static int __init mshv_check_sev_snp_support(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +#if defined(__x86_64__)
> + struct hv_input_get_system_property *input;
> + struct hv_output_get_system_property *output;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u64 status;
> + enum hv_snp_status snp_status;
> +
> + local_irq_save(flags);
> + input = *this_cpu_ptr(hyperv_pcpu_input_arg);
> + output = *this_cpu_ptr(hyperv_pcpu_output_arg);
> +
> + memset(input, 0, sizeof(*input));
> + input->property_id = HV_DYNAMIC_PROCESSOR_FEATURE_PROPERTY;
> + input->hv_processor_feature = HV_X64_DYNAMIC_PROCESSOR_FEATURE_SNP_STATUS;
> +
> + status = hv_do_hypercall(HVCALL_GET_SYSTEM_PROPERTY, input, output);
> + if (!hv_result_success(status)) {
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get SNP support: %s\n",
> + hv_result_to_string(status));
> + return hv_result_to_errno(status);
> + }
[Severity: High]
Similar to above, does returning an error here prevent the mshv module from
loading on systems without SEV-SNP support (like Intel CPUs) or on older
Hyper-V versions?
It appears this will abort module initialization if the hypercall fails.
> +
> + snp_status = output->hv_processor_feature_value;
> + local_irq_restore(flags);
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "SEV-SNP support status: %s (%u)\n",
> + hv_snp_status_to_string(snp_status), snp_status);
> +
> + if (snp_status == HV_SNP_STATUS_AVAILABLE)
> + return mshv_print_max_sev_snp_partitions(dev);
> +#endif
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int
> root_scheduler_init(struct device *dev)
> {
[ ... ]
> @@ -2763,6 +2866,10 @@ static int __init mshv_parent_partition_init(void)
> if (ret)
> goto synic_cleanup;
>
> + ret = mshv_check_sev_snp_support(dev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto synic_cleanup;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is where the error from the informational SEV-SNP checks causes module
initialization to abort. Should these functions handle unsupported features
gracefully instead of failing the init?
> ret = root_scheduler_init(dev);
> if (ret)
> goto synic_cleanup;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807135134.303943-1-weh@linux.microsoft.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 13:51 [PATCH v1 00/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP support for MSHV root partitions Wei Hu
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP UAPI definitions Wei Hu
2026-08-07 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP PSP request hypercall Wei Hu
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP isolated page hypercalls Wei Hu
2026-08-07 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] mshv: wire SEV-SNP partition ioctls Wei Hu
2026-08-07 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] hyperv: fix hv_input_get_system_property layout for SNP status Wei Hu
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] mshv: default to safe partition CPU features Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] mshv: accept partial CPU feature banks Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] mshv: define full processor and xsave feature masks Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] mshv: unmap SNP memory before state teardown Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] mshv: unlock SNP pages on panic for crashdump collection Wei Hu
2026-08-07 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] hyperv: add MSHV Dom0 root-partition boot enablement (EFI HvLoader) Wei Hu
2026-08-07 16:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] mshv: set up own SynIC registers on a nested root partition Wei Hu
2026-08-07 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807150427.4E2201F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=weh@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox