From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Wei Hu" <weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 07/13] mshv: default to safe partition CPU features
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:15:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807151551.6C1361F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807135134.303943-8-weh@linux.microsoft.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Functional regression and uninitialized stack memory use on ARM64 for legacy partition creation.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] TOCTOU double-fetch race allows validation and use of flag-gated parameters outside their flag gate.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v1 07/13] mshv: default to safe partition CPU features ---
commit 85299e9eb98a0db0daae1adea69f8e739d17d8db
Author: Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>
mshv: default to safe partition CPU features
For legacy create-partition callers, disable all processor and xsave
features first, then enable only the default feature set known to be
supported. Passing an all-zero disabled feature mask can make SEV-SNP
partition creation fail on Hyper-V.
> diff --git a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> index cc38507570ac4..11d3c86050b45 100644
> --- a/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/hv/mshv_root_main.c
> @@ -2333,6 +2333,86 @@ static long mshv_ioctl_process_pt_flags(void __user *user_arg, u64 *pt_flags,
> disabled_procs = &cr_props->disabled_processor_features;
> disabled_xsave = &cr_props->disabled_processor_xsave_features;
>
> + /* Disable all processor features first. */
> + for (i = 0; i < HV_PARTITION_PROCESSOR_FEATURES_BANKS; i++)
> + disabled_procs->as_uint64[i] = U64_MAX;
> +
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64)
> + /* Enable default features that are known to be supported. */
[ ... ]
> + disabled_xsave->as_uint64 = U64_MAX;
> + disabled_xsave->xsave_support = 0;
> + disabled_xsave->xsaveopt_support = 0;
> + disabled_xsave->avx_support = 0;
> +#endif
> +
> /* Check if user provided newer struct with feature fields */
> if (args.pt_flags & BIT_ULL(MSHV_PT_BIT_CPU_AND_XSAVE_FEATURES)) {
> if (copy_from_user(&args, user_arg, sizeof(args)))
> return -EFAULT;
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this second fetch from userspace
introduce a race condition?
If a concurrent userspace thread clears the MSHV_PT_BIT_CPU_AND_XSAVE_FEATURES
flag between the first and second fetch, args.pt_flags will be overwritten
with the new value. The code does not re-verify the flag before proceeding to
validate and use extended v2 fields like args.pt_num_cpu_fbanks.
This could allow the kernel to operate on uninitialized userspace garbage.
[ ... ]
> @@ -2371,16 +2451,6 @@ static long mshv_ioctl_process_pt_flags(void __user *user_arg, u64 *pt_flags,
> if (mshv_field_nonzero(args, pt_rsvd2))
> return -EINVAL;
> #endif
> - } else {
> - /*
> - * v1 behavior: try to enable everything. The hypervisor will
> - * disable features that are not supported. The banks can be
> - * queried via the get partition property hypercall.
> - */
> - for (i = 0; i < HV_PARTITION_PROCESSOR_FEATURES_BANKS; i++)
> - disabled_procs->as_uint64[i] = 0;
> -
> - disabled_xsave->as_uint64 = 0;
> }
>
> /* Only support EXO partitions */
[Severity: High]
Does removing this fallback initialization break legacy v1 callers on ARM64?
With this code removed, disabled_procs->as_uint64[i] is unconditionally set
to U64_MAX earlier in mshv_ioctl_process_pt_flags(), which disables all
processor features. Because the new default initializations are inside an
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_64) block, ARM64 callers never get those defaults
nor the old 0 initialization.
Additionally, disabled_xsave points to the disabled_processor_xsave_features
field of cr_props (which is on the stack in mshv_ioctl_create_partition).
Since it is no longer initialized to 0 here for non-x86 v1 callers, will it
send uninitialized stack memory to the hypervisor?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807135134.303943-1-weh@linux.microsoft.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 15:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 13:51 [PATCH v1 00/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP support for MSHV root partitions Wei Hu
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 01/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP UAPI definitions Wei Hu
2026-08-07 14:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP PSP request hypercall Wei Hu
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] mshv: add SEV-SNP isolated page hypercalls Wei Hu
2026-08-07 14:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] mshv: wire SEV-SNP partition ioctls Wei Hu
2026-08-07 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] hyperv: fix hv_input_get_system_property layout for SNP status Wei Hu
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] mshv: detect and report SEV-SNP support at init Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] mshv: default to safe partition CPU features Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] mshv: accept partial CPU feature banks Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] mshv: define full processor and xsave feature masks Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] mshv: unmap SNP memory before state teardown Wei Hu
2026-08-07 15:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] mshv: unlock SNP pages on panic for crashdump collection Wei Hu
2026-08-07 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] hyperv: add MSHV Dom0 root-partition boot enablement (EFI HvLoader) Wei Hu
2026-08-07 16:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 13:51 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] mshv: set up own SynIC registers on a nested root partition Wei Hu
2026-08-07 16:36 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807151551.6C1361F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=weh@linux.microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox