RE: [PATCH net-next v8 6/9] net: txgbe: Support GPIO to SFP socket

["Jiawen Wu" <jiawenwu@trustnetic.com>]

On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 11:01 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:55:01AM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > > > > > +   gc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*gc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > > > +   if (!gc)
> > > > > > +           return -ENOMEM;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +   gc->label = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "txgbe_gpio-%x",
> > > > > > +                              (wx->pdev->bus->number << 8) | wx->pdev->devfn);
> > > > > > +   gc->base = -1;
> > > > > > +   gc->ngpio = 6;
> > > > > > +   gc->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> > > > > > +   gc->parent = dev;
> > > > > > +   gc->fwnode = software_node_fwnode(txgbe->nodes.group[SWNODE_GPIO]);
> > > > >
> > > > > Looking at the I²C case, I'm wondering if gpio-regmap can be used for this piece.
> > > >
> > > > I can access this GPIO region directly, do I really need to use regmap?
> > >
> > > It's not a matter of access, it's a matter of using an existing
> > > wrapper that will give you already a lot of code done there, i.o.w.
> > > you don't need to reinvent a wheel.
> >
> > I took a look at the gpio-regmap code, when I call devm_gpio_regmap_register(),
> > I should provide gpio_regmap_config.irq_domain if I want to add the gpio_irq_chip.
> > But in this use, GPIO IRQs are requested by SFP driver. How can I get irq_domain
> > before SFP probe? And where do I add IRQ parent handler?
> 
> I _think_ you are mixing upstream IRQs and downstream IRQs.
> 
> Interrupts are arranged in trees. The CPU itself only has one or two
> interrupts. e.g. for ARM you have FIQ and IRQ. When the CPU gets an
> interrupt, you look in the interrupt controller to see what external
> or internal interrupt triggered the CPU interrupt. And that interrupt
> controller might indicate the interrupt came from another interrupt
> controller. Hence the tree structure. And each node in the tree is
> considered an interrupt domain.
> 
> A GPIO controller can also be an interrupt controller. It has an
> upstream interrupt, going to the controller above it. And it has
> downstream interrupts, the GPIO lines coming into it which can cause
> an interrupt. And the GPIO interrupt controller is a domain.
> 
> So what exactly does gpio_regmap_config.irq_domain mean? Is it the
> domain of the upstream interrupt controller? Is it an empty domain
> structure to be used by the GPIO interrupt controller? It is very
> unlikely to have anything to do with the SFP devices below it.

Sorry, since I don't know much about interrupt,  it is difficult to understand
regmap-irq in a short time. There are many questions about regmap-irq.

When I want to add an IRQ chip for regmap, for the further irq_domain,
I need to pass a parameter of IRQ, and this IRQ will be requested with handler:
regmap_irq_thread(). Which IRQ does it mean? In the previous code of using
devm_gpiochip_add_data(), I set the MSI-X interrupt as gpio-irq's parent, but
it was used to set chained handler only. Should the parent be this IRQ? I found
the error with irq_free_descs and irq_domain_remove when I remove txgbe.ko.

As you said, the interrupt of each tree node has its domain. Can I understand
that there are two layer in the interrupt tree for MSI-X and GPIOs, and requesting
them separately is not conflicting? Although I thought so, but after I implement
gpio-regmap, SFP driver even could not find gpio_desc. Maybe I missed something
on registering gpio-regmap...

Anyway it is a bit complicated, could I use this version of GPIO implementation if
it's really tough? Thanks.