Re: [PATCH] fix PCA waitforcompletion() return value

[Ben Dooks <ben-i2c-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>]

On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:08:48PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
> 
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 11:31:23 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 11:20:48AM +0200, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> > > ret is still -1, if during the polling read_byte() returns at once
> > > with I2C_PCA_CON_SI set. So ret > 0 would lead *_waitforcompletion()
> > > to return 0, in spite of the proper behavior.
> > > 
> > > The routine was rewritten, so that ret has always a proper value,
> > > before returning.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists-gM/Ye1E23mwN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
> > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > 
> > Great! Jean, I think this is .36-relevant. Do you plan another
> > pull-request (hmm, there is still my clientdata-patch ;))? Should
> > probably go to stable, too.
> 
> Yes, I have a few i2c patches scheduled for 2.6.36 and plan to send
> Linus a pull request soon. I'm a little busy this week at work, and also
> due to a complete workstastion update so I must setup a number of
> things again and this temporarily hinders my efficiency.

Want me to push it, i've a few fixes too.

-- 
Ben

Q:      What's a light-year?
A:      One-third less calories than a regular year.