[PATCH v2] I2C: Make i2cdev_notifier_call static

[PATCH v2] I2C: Make i2cdev_notifier_call static

[Shubhrajyoti D]

The function i2cdev_notifier_call is used only in i2c-dev file
making it static.
Also removes the following sparse warning

drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c:582:5: warning: symbol 'i2cdev_notifier_call'
was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
index c90ce50..57a45ce 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int i2cdev_detach_adapter(struct device *dev, void *dummy)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int i2cdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
+static int i2cdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
 			 void *data)
 {
 	struct device *dev = data;
-- 
1.7.1

Re: [PATCH v2] I2C: Make i2cdev_notifier_call static

[Jean Delvare]

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:17:31 +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> The function i2cdev_notifier_call is used only in i2c-dev file
> making it static.
> Also removes the following sparse warning
> 
> drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c:582:5: warning: symbol 'i2cdev_notifier_call'
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
> index c90ce50..57a45ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static int i2cdev_detach_adapter(struct device *dev, void *dummy)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -int i2cdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
> +static int i2cdev_notifier_call(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
>  			 void *data)
>  {
>  	struct device *dev = data;

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jean Delvare