public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Peter Chang <dpf@google.com>,
	Deepa Dinamani <deepadinamani@google.com>,
	John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux
Date: Thu, 24 May 2018 10:46:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180524084646.31697-1-peda@axentia.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFNjLiXZk3Zigfpy9Hj2uY92sPGB7msUxoZHf6pFDOWSuBwkBA@mail.gmail.com>

Changes since v1:
- Further compile tests indicated a missing #define for rt_mutex_lock
  with lockdep enabled, so that one is added.
- I have verified that I don't get any lockdep splat for a local i2c-mux
  setup with these patches applied, and that I do without them.

Again, thanks for the report!

Cheers,
Peter

Peter Rosin (2):
  rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking
  i2c: mux: annotate the nested rt_mutex usage

 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c |  2 +-
 drivers/i2c/i2c-mux.c       |  4 ++--
 include/linux/rtmutex.h     |  7 +++++++
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c    | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
2.11.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-24  8:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAFNjLiXZk3Zigfpy9Hj2uY92sPGB7msUxoZHf6pFDOWSuBwkBA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-05-24  7:32 ` Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux Peter Rosin
2018-05-24  7:32   ` [PATCH 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking Peter Rosin
2018-05-26  8:23     ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-26  8:23     ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-26  9:26     ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-24  7:32   ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: mux: annotate the nested rt_mutex usage Peter Rosin
2018-05-26 10:11     ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-24  8:46 ` Peter Rosin [this message]
2018-05-24  8:46   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking Peter Rosin
2018-05-24  8:46   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: mux: annotate the nested rt_mutex usage Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 13:52   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking Peter Rosin
2018-05-28  5:19     ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-28  7:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-28 20:51         ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24 13:52   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: mux: annotate the nested rt_mutex usage Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 18:21   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux John Sperbeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180524084646.31697-1-peda@axentia.se \
    --to=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=deepadinamani@google.com \
    --cc=dpf@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jsperbeck@google.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pombredanne@nexb.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox