From: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Peter Chang <dpf@google.com>,
Deepa Dinamani <deepadinamani@google.com>,
John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 16:23:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201805261450.APBciksQ%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180524073255.22495-2-peda@axentia.se>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1818 bytes --]
Hi Peter,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc6]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Peter-Rosin/rtmutex-allow-specifying-a-subclass-for-nested-locking/20180526-140421
config: x86_64-randconfig-i0-201820 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.3.0-16) 7.3.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
kernel/locking/locktorture.c: In function 'torture_rtmutex_lock':
>> kernel/locking/locktorture.c:444:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'rt_mutex_lock'; did you mean 'ww_mutex_lock'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
rt_mutex_lock(&torture_rtmutex);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
ww_mutex_lock
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +444 kernel/locking/locktorture.c
095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 441
095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 442 static int torture_rtmutex_lock(void) __acquires(torture_rtmutex)
095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 443 {
095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 @444 rt_mutex_lock(&torture_rtmutex);
095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 445 return 0;
095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 446 }
095777c4 Davidlohr Bueso 2015-07-22 447
:::::: The code at line 444 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 095777c417db142970adeb776fa0cb10810b8122 locktorture: Support rtmutex torturing
:::::: TO: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
:::::: CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 26734 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-26 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAFNjLiXZk3Zigfpy9Hj2uY92sPGB7msUxoZHf6pFDOWSuBwkBA@mail.gmail.com>
2018-05-24 7:32 ` Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 7:32 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking Peter Rosin
2018-05-26 8:23 ` kbuild test robot [this message]
2018-05-26 8:23 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-26 9:26 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-24 7:32 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: mux: annotate the nested rt_mutex usage Peter Rosin
2018-05-26 10:11 ` kbuild test robot
2018-05-24 8:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 8:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 8:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] i2c: mux: annotate the nested rt_mutex usage Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] rtmutex: allow specifying a subclass for nested locking Peter Rosin
2018-05-28 5:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-28 7:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-05-28 20:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2018-05-24 13:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: mux: annotate the nested rt_mutex usage Peter Rosin
2018-05-24 18:21 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Re: Problem: lockdep warning with nested instances of i2c-mux John Sperbeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201805261450.APBciksQ%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=deepadinamani@google.com \
--cc=dpf@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jsperbeck@google.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox